Selling new construction after receiving funding / Wohnriester - possible?

Is there a site plan here? I want to understand why the music does not cover the entire construction area. How can it be that only kati is affected by it??

Is there a site plan here? I want to understand why the music does not cover the entire construction area. How can it be that only kati is affected??

Because it is an individual sensitivity. She already wrote that it does not bother her husband either.

To return to the actual question:

There is an extensive FAQ at the Central Allowance Office for Retirement Assets. On page 24, there is information on this. Otherwise, they will surely provide information by phone as well.

Unfortunately, I cannot upload it here :(

Google search terms: Sell new build after receiving promotion Wohnriester central

Perhaps this is also interesting for others.

I sometimes read here that the neighbor must also be able to freely live out his right. However, I do not find that appropriate in this case.

Of course, you mow your lawn, of course there is a birthday party or a gathering of friends. All existing guidelines and the state cannot and should not regulate this conclusively, because there is a social coexistence that is based more on consideration than on the unconditional enforcement of individual interests.
However, I have no understanding at all that someone really wants to constantly and always have the music he chooses in terms of volume, duration, and type playing, and that his neighbor inevitably has to hear and endure this. Where is MY freedom to not want to listen to music now on my property or in my house?
Anyone who does not understand this just imagine that children would be stomping above him all day, a machine knocking, his neighbor making noise all day and insisting on his right to free living out.
My freedom ends exactly where another person is affected by it. Unfortunately, nowadays many people perceive their own personal freedom as a free pass to do whatever they want and the other person just has to endure that. This is not freedom but ignorance and inconsiderateness.
His hobby is music, but I would be interested in what he would say if ’s hobby was daily and hours-long hammering and drilling on stone because she likes to artistically process stones, plus a few barking dogs etc... All just as she wants it, after all she is free and on her property, so she can do it all as she pleases, preferably with three drills at the same time.
Our coexistence was based on consideration and SOCIAL togetherness. Unfortunately, this is increasingly lost and even leads to people being called "sick" if they do not want constant noise. The main thing is that my twisted ego is asserted. o_O

The question would be, what happens if the same thing happens in the new house, for example due to village music, youth who hang out in the forest often and play music? Do you move so often until you are financially ruined or do you tackle the problem at its root?

Well, enough with the nonsense now. Yes, it’s unspecific, but that’s enough for now. Village music and village youth are a completely different matter than constant(!!!) noise from the neighbor. Anyone who doesn’t eventually go crazy over that, in my eyes, is not quite normal.

I sometimes read here that the neighbor must also be able to freely live out his rights. However, I do not find this appropriate in this case.

Of course, you mow your lawn, of course, there is the birthday party or the gathering of friends. All existing guidelines and the state cannot and should not regulate this conclusively, because there is a social coexistence that is based more on consideration than on the unconditional enforcement of individual interests. But I have no understanding at all for someone who really always wants to have the music they choose in volume, duration, and type playing constantly and for their neighbor to necessarily have to listen to and endure it. Where is MY freedom then that I do not want to listen to music on my property or in my house? Anyone who does not understand this should just imagine children stomping above them all day, a machine knocking, their neighbor making noise all day and insisting on their right to live freely. My freedom ends exactly where another person is affected by it. Unfortunately, nowadays many people perceive their own personal freedom as a free pass to do whatever they want and the other person just has to put up with it. That is not freedom but ignorance and inconsiderateness. His hobby is music, but I would be interested in what he would say if ’s hobby was daily and hours-long hammering and drilling on stone because she likes to artistically process stones, plus some barking dogs, etc... All as she wants, after all, she is free and on her property, so she can do whatever she wants, preferably with three drills at the same time. Our coexistence was based on consideration and SOCIAL interaction. Unfortunately, this is increasingly being lost and even leads to people being called "sick" if they do not want continuous noise. The main thing is that even my twisted ego gets asserted. o_O

That’s all true so far, but it only bothers one person. What if the neighbor to the left is not allowed to listen to music, the one to the right is not allowed to keep dogs, and behind me the neighbor does not like loud gardening work? How far should it go?

What happens if he listens to music inside the house but opens the terrace door and then Kati hears the music? Also unacceptable?

In my eyes, this is a typical German problem. People think that when they own a property and house, it has to be like in solitude, absolute quiet. For that, you shouldn’t buy 1,000 sqm but a few hectares...