Selling new construction after receiving funding / Wohnriester - possible?

Now autumn is approaching again first, and then winter. :eek: Hopefully, this will also bring some relief regarding noise disturbance. Until then, there may have been (hopefully) the clarifying conversation with the neighbor.

I find it most astonishing in this thread that quite a few are of the opinion that if something is legal, it must therefore be tolerated.

Every day we refrain from doing a hundred things that would be legal because besides the law there is also something like decency and manners. And because even things that are legal can violate decency.

Despite the notice of the disturbance, not offering a compromise but even continuing to play music on Sundays(!) is simply indecent – completely regardless of whether it is legal or not.

That this lack of decency has now become én vogue is not German, but very 2021. Society is becoming more self-centered. Garnished with “then just go to the doctor.” Less empathy is not possible.

People with social decency do not constantly have music playing on the terrace when they have neighbors. Not even at permitted volume and during permitted times. Because not everything that is allowed is also okay.

A compromise would consist of agreed quiet times outside the legal framework. I found the idea of the “sock on the door” funny, but also pragmatic. If the neighbor partly refrains from music, Kati partly gives up quiet. Neither gets fully what they want, but the overall situation would be more relaxed.

Companies for soundproofing measures
Noise assessors

I wouldn't just do something

Aha....since when is a minimum number of affected persons required? Where does it say that? And you decide who the problem is?

At the latest in court. Otherwise it is a case of one statement against another, and in Germany it is still: "Innocent until proven guilty."

..,
in Germany it still applies: "Innocent until guilt is proven".

‚In dubio pro reo‘ - When in doubt, for the accused
Here again:
At court and at sea, one is in God's hands …

At the latest in court. Otherwise, it’s just statement against statement, and in Germany it still applies: "Innocent until guilt is proven."

Sorry, but you’re just mixing up some terms here arbitrarily and wildly, just to make it sound nice—from "typical German" to "statement against statement." In a school test, that would be "off topic" plus "fail."
If a disturbance exists, no further steps are necessary, with or without court, or is murder only forbidden starting from double murder?? Oh dear....
This is not about the classical form of guilt...
Somehow this sounds like TV courtroom show sofa knowledge à la millions national coach.
Here, a person feels strongly disturbed and impaired by excessive use of their speakers (see e.g. higher regional court ruling). And....as wonderfully explained, not everything is okay that is not explicitly forbidden. His "letting loose" interferes with the life of another. I had also referred to the definition of "room volume."
As nicely describes, it often has something to do with decency and social behavior. But then again, you can’t buy that at Aldi or get it as a free subsidy from the KfW, although that would probably be a more sensible solution than some others.
Here, someone feels bad and then has to read that the neighbor is right with his speakers, and that the woman should just stop making such a fuss. That already drips heavily with spite.