Selling new construction after receiving funding / Wohnriester - possible?

Some people find headphones annoying, others find being blasted with sound annoying. Whose problem is it now? Such and similar trivialities are dealt with by German local courts every minute. But why? Even if you win the case, you still end up with the fuss and quarrel disturbing the neighborhood relationship as long as you live there. Basically, you can only flee.

We are talking past each other. The fact that you are not allowed to listen to music in the garden is not stated in any law/regulation. That you are not allowed to play loud music, and at certain times, is regulated. And if you feel blasted with sound, for example, although the neighbor is not playing loud music, whose problem is it?

Where does it start, where does it end? If I build a fence on the right side to the neighbor (the side I have to take care of) and the neighbor is disturbed by the color or the height, although I comply with the regulations, whose problem is that? Should I tear down the fence and build it the way the neighbor wants? There are definitely limits set by regulations/laws. Everything else is handled face to face and tries to reach compromises.

So clearly, it's Kati's problem, not the neighbor's. He isn't bothered by anything. I would coldly try a few things that might annoy him. Maybe plant a tree that sheds a lot of needles and affects his wind direction or get alpacas (if you don't want to flee, I mean, seriously? He can just move).

Everything else is settled between two parties and compromises are tried to be made.

We did try. He promised us to skip it ONE DAY a week, namely Sunday. And yesterday there was music playing from morning till evening, except for the one hour around noon when my husband went over and asked him to turn it off. Despite knowing that it bothers us, our personal request that day, and the agreement, he still turned it back on shortly afterwards. So much for keeping compromises.

Everything else is settled between two people and attempts are made to reach compromises.

However, successful compromises are a rope that BOTH have to pull on :-)

The word already says it
com = Lat. together, common
pro = for (-each other)
mittere = to give up, to gift, to let go

Despite his knowledge that it bothers us, our personal appearance on that day, and the agreement, he turned it back on shortly afterwards anyway. So much for keeping compromises.

As I said before, fight fire with fire. What else do you have to lose? Those who voluntarily become the victim should not be surprised if they get conned.