Floor plan tube house L-shape triangular plot including oak tree

  • Erstellt am 2018-11-04 10:54:33

Müllerin

2018-11-12 14:44:05
  • #1


then the city should have bought it to avoid anything being built there.

Silly because densification is sensible, but only where it makes sense. I don’t see that on this property right now.



Well, oaks have taproots, meaning the main root usually goes pretty much straight down. Still, it is said that the roots extend underground at least as far as the crown above.
But it can also be more. Normally, an oak doesn’t immediately die if the lateral roots are affected, as long as the taproot is not damaged.

But you only really know afterwards – and I wouldn’t take any risk with a tree like that and start digging for a basement. But I’m not being asked.
And what the OP wants to build, in my opinion, can’t be realized there.

Let’s see if he gets back to us with complete measurements and conditions etc.
 

Mottenhausen

2018-11-12 14:53:31
  • #2


Ok, we will wait for the correct site plan in case OP uploads it and then we will overlay both graphics semi-transparently. I am really curious about the 2m.

An architect also costs money, I would only consult one if the plot absolutely has to be that specific one. The same applies to further surveying services.

I have already recommended applying for an exception regarding the setback areas many pages ago.
 

Escroda

2018-11-12 14:55:54
  • #3
On what legal basis? And at what price? Pay the building land price and turn it into green space? Perhaps the 15% Green Party voters would understand that, the rest will be amused by it in the "nonsense of the week" on extra3. That is very subjective, which is why I find "silly" inappropriate. That matches the conditions the OP mentioned: crown + 1.5m. I’m with you on that. Therefore, I am eagerly awaiting his plan.
 

kaho674

2018-11-12 15:16:27
  • #4
Yep!
 

Lumpi_LE

2018-11-12 15:19:00
  • #5
*23% ... :'o
 

hanse987

2018-11-12 15:35:40
  • #6
Even if it was said that the tree is off-limits, still submit an application for the removal of the tree. Reason: Not buildable with a residential building. They can do no more than reject it. In case of rejection, try to somehow cancel the purchase.
 

Similar topics
17.04.2016Value of land and bungalow B5511
08.11.2010Offer for a semi-detached house with land, okay?11
07.07.2011Financing land now, house in 6 months?17
14.08.2012Build a home? Land in prospect19
25.03.2012Land now - house construction next year23
31.05.2012Financing of the property: Does the entire financing need to be secured?11
04.09.2012Land paid - Building with an additional loan?16
02.09.2013Angular bungalow on 800m² plot - financially feasible?16
09.02.2013What do you think of this property?11
28.05.2013I am getting a plot of land as a gift. How do I finance the construction?16
03.06.2013Buying land from father - building a house yes or no?11
01.08.2013Is the property right for us?15
22.08.2013Buying land for a house, please advise!46
05.02.2014Costs/planning land, additional construction costs, turnkey, etc.27
22.08.2013Plot - Decision?14
28.08.2013Separate land and generate building land? Where to inquire?14
14.11.2013Our floor plan of 120 sqm on a 469 sqm plot73
29.10.2013Property reserved, construction financing plan, architect/building permit application21
03.01.2014How much land and house can we afford?25
05.10.2017Property / Development Plan / Retaining Walls / Excavations17

Oben