Floor plan tube house L-shape triangular plot including oak tree

I would say: exclusively unofficially, the chamber is probably not supposed to know that. From my point of view, it is even criminally disloyal, the architect is supposed to act impartially for the client.

Especially since he earns very good money with us. Greed knows no bounds.

I would probably reduce his fee by the bribe.

Even if it's off-topic: Is it actually normal for the architect to receive a commission from the contracted companies? Of course unofficially...

Actually, I wanted to write "of course not." But that's not true. They make tenders in their favor. See the film "Semmeling, einmal im Leben". Anyone who doesn't watch it is to blame themselves. Well...

In Katja's defense (and all skeptics here in the thread including myself!)

The doubts about the buildability were based on:

1. a localization of the corpus delicti on the property only through hand sketches, Google Maps screenshots, and self-made, guessed site plans
2. incomprehensible statements from the authorities regarding required additional distances
3. the unthinkability of the authority reducing the minimum distances for better buildability
4. permission for boundary construction at the sidewalk

All points have accordingly expanded the "building window" to a usable size.

Therefore, this bet was of course nonsense, I could have also described our building plot as unbuildable (wrong sketches, etc.) and now show you pictures of the finished house: nyah-nyah.

Is it normal for the architect to receive a commission from the contracted companies? Of course unofficially...

Then be careful that with an expensive item, significant unplanned additional quantities don't suddenly occur that you have to pay for... I would then offset that against the architect's commission.

In Katja's defense (and all the skeptics here in the thread including myself!)

The doubts about the buildability were based on:

1. a location of the corpus delicti on the property only based on hand sketches, Google Maps screenshots and self-created, guessed site plans
2. incomprehensible statements from authorities regarding required additional distances
3. unthinkability of the authorities reducing the minimum distances for better buildability
4. permission of boundary construction on the sidewalk

All points accordingly widened the "building window" to a usable extent.

Therefore, of course, this bet was nonsense, I could have also described our building plot as unbuildable (wrong sketches etc.) and now could show you pictures of the finished house: nah-nah.

Sounds like you’re accusing me of intent...

It’s not easy to admit, but it was simply incompetence combined with gaps in knowledge.