11ant
2017-06-27 01:05:03
- #1
That's right.I notice that the planner basically just drew in your sketch.
Or four? - I'm thinking of a basement with utility rooms, ground floor, upper floor, and expanded attic (without knee wall it should work height-wise).Do you think it would be easier on 3 levels?
Just make a list with post-its or something. In the middle of a sheet, an anchor room, e.g., living room. Then stick all the rooms that should be on the same floor onto the same sheet. Each note a room name with sqm. Maximum floor budget e.g. 75 to 80 sqm (plus hallways) per "full floor".
If only one of the children is a girl, in other words four boys, there will probably be phases when they’d like to share a room two by two. I would distribute the children into four rooms: one large for the oldest child, one large for two children, two small for two individual children.
In my opinion, 10 sqm children's rooms are bedrooms where homework is already done at the kitchen table. A teenager loses it in such a rabbit hutch. And with increasing age, children will also want to avoid each other for hours at a time.
Personally, I consider two and a half meters width of the narrow side the limit; below that, in my opinion, are "half rooms." The door and window positions already impose "enough" vetoes on how you can arrange furniture. At some point, the restrictions outweigh the benefits.
Practicality in the house only goes yes or no, not "maybe" or "a little." Also think about the tax office (spatial separation).