It's not about keeping the money. Rather, putting the money into the house elsewhere, e.g. upgrading fittings.
I had already understood that. However, you qualify your financing application with usage descriptions that become part of the basis for the loan approval decision. By doing so, you promise to create the collateral value for the money in the form presented. What you describe is the basis for an immediate termination due to the loss of the basis of the contract in the described form as well as due to a profound disturbance of the trust relationship and, in my opinion, also criminal as fraud in conjunction with forgery of documents. You cannot unilaterally dispose of the amounts; the loan application describes a joint project "use of the bank's money for the construction of a specific collateral object." You must not dispose of it in bad faith.
But if I only submit the offer from the general contractor, some things are still missing that can only be priced with the upgrading. Maybe I also have a conceptual error.
You certainly do. Because nobody—not even a banker, not even from Sparkasse Dummsdorf—would seriously set unknown amounts to "0." Realistic estimates belong there. Buffers are needed for something else, namely for unexpected cost increases (for example, if the tilers' guild negotiates an eight-percent wage increase). But I see no sudden additional need on your part for gold-plating the outdoor water tap, or what kind of super worst-case scenario are you expecting in the upgrading?
One primarily hopes for a quick conclusion, because often the number "bottom right" is mainly used as a comparison and decision criterion among several providers.
But a provider would be trading off, winning price-sensitive customers more easily only at the price of them certainly not recommending him to their friends. The reputation one can gain with this clientele depends essentially on the truthfulness of the "number bottom right." That this is "lied like it is printed" can only be afforded by a big name with its inflated advertising department, since such is an indispensable prerequisite for the survival of a brand with the sales method "burn and run." The construction company Jupp Schmitz & Son from the neighboring town cannot proceed this way; otherwise, it would never have come to "& Son."
I would not be satisfied with 35°C flow temperature. Have them offer you 30°C!
Far from heating construction being my specialty, I have the impression that it is not that of the preferred general contractor either. That is why I already recommended to the OP (via PM) to consider outsourcing this trade. A good
general contractor does not have to be a
universal jack-of-all-trades, and everyone probably has their weak spot.