Single-family house, approximately 160m², Bauhaus style; first draft according to our wishes

So I don’t see your examples as that critical, we are not at “Groundhog Day,” where the OP experiences the same thing over and over again every day after moving in

Of course the jack-in-the-box gag doesn’t work a second time. But this example shows, in my opinion, beyond doubt that the architect must have missed all the lectures on spatial experience, he unfortunately has no clue about it at all. However, I consider this to be a legitimately expected significant added value of an architect compared to a general contractor’s draftsman. Where there is an extra charge, there must also be an improved performance. And – just so that this is explicitly said again – I did not say this multiple times so that the world would remember it, and it is not supposed to be my house. Rather, the OP did not understand my point once, then did not understand it a second time with different words, so I varied my verbal expression once more. If even Yvonne does not understand it then, I exceptionally resort to the mouse and add pictures. If you want, you can happily build it as drawn in post #46 – I’m merely predicting that the client will then rub his eyes in disbelief at the spot of my orange arrow, that he didn’t order it that way and it didn’t become obvious to him on the 2D plan either. And exactly that an architect must notice and a general contractor’s draftsman regularly cannot.

If you reflect on it now, you tell yourself - who plans a dressing room like that, it doesn't make much sense to continue with them, right?

I don’t know which draft you are referring to, but there is also a gray area between black and white. And therefore: with the first suggestion from the OP, there wasn’t much to do, so back to zero. For the second one, I take the dressing room and bedroom, move the middle wall and swap the bed with the wardrobes. Door from the hallway, just as you suggested (and THAT draft I mean, which is supposed to be from Rensch-Haus, as you say). I find the Ligno or the dressing room there impossible. That is a leftover piece of a room. A storage room.

Well, what is exaggerated about that?

Everything! As Zaba already writes: it’s not about finding your Hansano yogurt on the supermarket shelf. It’s also not about everyone finding the marital bed. It is, like so many things from you, overly exaggerated. One should just keep things realistic.

I have already planned (not drawn) houses as an elementary school student. After my civilian service, I indeed no longer pursued the professional field of residential architect, but became a hybrid of management consultant and specialist planner.

A lot happens in 40, 50 years. Also in the style of house planning.

In 40, 50 years a lot happens. Also in the style of house planning.

Forty. This is not about style - otherwise my taste would also lead to almost purely Nordlys building areas *LOL* - but about whether an architect is aware of the 3D consequences of his 2D drawing or not. "Architecture" is not simply "civil engineering" but "value added civil engineering" - the eye (and Feng Shui) also builds; even if clients understand "Bauhaus" only as "flat roof matte white", want to brick everything that is "not on the tree by three" or imagine themselves in Tuscany with a house with a skirted base. "Architecture" very much also means that the client does not only believe an expert of his lawyer that the built house is the same as seen on the plans.

Learned something new again, now I know the definition of an architect.

I already planned houses (not painted) as an elementary school student. After my civil service, I indeed no longer pursued the professional field of residential architect but became a hybrid of management consultant and specialist planner.

Haha, I had to laugh at this post. Management consultant and specialist planner living in a rental apartment! Well, who knows what kind of hardships you've experienced, but your posts are just arrogant.

I won't even touch on the personal dimension, that would be too much off topic. But from the words ...

Unternehmensberater und Fachplaner in einer Mietwohnung lebt!

... the basic attitude seems to me to be that renting is probably a form of housing finance for losers. On the contrary: my previous apartment was also nice. But when the area lost its residential value, I was glad that I didn’t own the depreciation. I can be a specialist planner anywhere there is internet; as a management consultant (operating "on-site nationwide") you have to be able to shift your regional center from time to time, over 50 even in golf course professions things get tougher. And otherwise I advise people against building whose family space requirements cannot be roughly estimated with some certainty for ten or more years. I don’t think the current real estate bubble will last much longer, and therefore I don’t want to speculate that when selling due to changed space requirements the price level will still cooperate, so as not to incur a loss.