kati1337
2022-02-01 22:14:44
- #1
Quite simply, because I have already sold too many cars privately in my life to be willing to put up with the stress of a house. It was always easiest with cars that had engine/transmission damage or <5k€. The realtor should nicely provide their phone number and pre-screen and check for financing feasibility. There have already been enough examples here where the bank gave a "financing commitment" and in the end it still fell through because of lending values and outdated BRW. For this handling, I pay (or rather the buyer pays) the realtor.
When my parents sold, it was through a realtor and both sides were very satisfied - or rather still are.
I only want to do a few viewings (have done?) and then go with them to the notary and sign.
I of course always mean a "real realtor".
Mine also made these claims about connections to banks, and that he could assess whether someone had sufficient creditworthiness or not. But it never fully made sense to me. What exactly entitles a realtor to have more information about a buyer’s creditworthiness?
Do they then carry out Schufa checks on interested parties with their consent, or how does that work? As far as I remember, he denied that when asked.
Of course, I can understand the rest of the argument. Sure, it’s less effort for me. If we were talking about 3-5k, I think I would do it without hesitation as well. But for 20,000€, I have to work a long time, I wouldn’t just throw that away.