11ant
2018-12-22 18:44:08
- #1
I think you shouldn’t either. To be honest, I’m very unsure whether he meant this suggestion to the OP as empathy or as a parody.I can’t really get behind the point system with the criteria from #218, by the way.
I think you shouldn’t either. To be honest, I’m very unsure whether he meant this suggestion to the OP as empathy or as a parody.I can’t really get behind the point system with the criteria from #218, by the way.
Well, I have to defend the OP there. From the outside it is always easier to bring structure into it. We don't have the coordination with the partner, price/performance considerations, etc. I never said it was simple.Forms a knot in the head and is unable to untangle this knot by themselves, even though it is so simple.
I rather think it was an allusion to the professional background; every programmer should have come into contact with these business administration aspects at some point.whether it was meant as empathy or as a parody
Well, I have to defend the OP here. It's always easier to bring structure from the outside. We don't have the coordination with the partner, price/performance considerations, etc. I never said it was easy.
You don’t have to build closed because of heating. You cannot compare houses built according to the Energy Saving Ordinance with older houses. Your stairwell will never be as cold unheated as it used to be.
Do we already know him? Is he from you or from the BT?
What is the latest status from the architect and what do you like or not like?
You try to squeeze everything into the south and you get these statements.
Single-family house without a basement with something around 130-140 sqm on the respective plot. In the garden a shed for junk and either a garage or a carport, whatever fits better with the floor plan. On the ground floor you’d like a cozy living corner, preferably "closed off"/hidden. The kitchen should be able to be separated from the living room. Dining area should be where there is space but sufficient for about 6 people. An office at least 8 sqm, no matter where. The WC should have no shower. The utility room should of course be included.
Light must be there, space must be there, x meters length of the kitchen, storage space for x, y and z, at least 2 x 3 meters closet space, TV chill-out lounge and dining area for 6. 2 children’s rooms, office, bathroom etc... all that has priority 10. Period.
Now the main point. We want to use our garden with a terrace and plenty of lawn area, whereby a strip of lawn about 8x8 is needed so that we can set up the inflatable pool in summer. In general, the terrace/garden should be easily accessible and as far as the floor plan allows, visible from the house.
If that doesn’t help, the additional effort will be charged.
You also have to be able to filter and weigh... exactly... set priorities
If the OP then repositions to the start to go the same way again or to take a completely different one, this is the wrong approach here.
Well, I have to defend the OP there. It is always easier to bring structure in from the outside.
....In the garden, there should be a terrace for 6 people, the rest should be lawn area. On the lawn there will be a double swing and in summer a 4-4.5 meter diameter pool. The garden should be visible from the house....
Yes, and we have been saying for weeks that the building body should be 10x9 meters, but they are trying to make us take another route.