On which of these floor plans can we continue to build?

I keep trying.

If the house is 10 meters wide, then the areas cooking/dining/living can either be distributed along this width, so actually only 9.30 meters, and make this area deeper. Or one uses an L-shaped room and lets the area that should go to the back disappear around the corner. In this case, you would then have the 9.30 meters to the garden for 2 areas, but not quite as deep.

What about the 3rd floor plan from the entrance thread?

Maybe the office room could be made a bit taller so that the area in front of the WC becomes a bit bigger. The wall between the kitchen and living room could also be removed or made half-high towards the garden. Of course, there should still be a window in the upper hallway. The upper hallway could also be made a bit wider if it should be too narrow. Then the actually too large children's rooms would become a bit smaller.

And then I have another floor plan here (without windows and doors), based on the Danwood P 151.3.

It may be that the U-shaped staircase is a bit too large. The staircase could perhaps also be moved a bit downward. The starting point is still open. I had planned it in front of the door to the living room so that the area under the staircase in the lower right would be walkable.

Furthermore, I also have the Park 151W from Danwood. Maybe something could be built on this as well?

Expressing yourself in a way that is understandable to fellow discussants – whether concerning paths or intermediate stages – is apparently not your domain on the graphic level in my opinion

I am aware that the images created with Word are not eye-catching, but you don't always have the appropriate program available. And SweetHome certainly is not an architect's program, but it does have dimensions. Can you recommend a more visually appealing program?

But for the next step (stairs and the area underneath) I either see you tiring out a group of fellow discussants again until they wear out, or you look for a suitable other communication level to convey yourself to the further planner.

But verbal communication is not always easy either.

It is an open wooden staircase after all

True. Now just imagine that the concrete staircase is painted white and the door opposite is a glass door and the wardrobe with sliding doors is built into the wall on the left.

What do you think?

Hmm, I find it rather not so harmonious. Apart from that, we will most likely not have floor-to-ceiling windows upstairs.

That the images created with Word are not eye-catching is clear to me, [...] Can you recommend a more visually appealing program?

I was not talking about design aspects of the drawings, but about your fundamental (in my opinion non-) affinity for coding your discussion content into graphics.

At Danwood, the rooms are very small. If the size of the bedrooms is enough for you, I would take the office upstairs and add the room downstairs to the living room. Your living-dining area is as small as in my old apartment. That was already cramped for two, a disaster for three, and with four I would get claustrophobic.

True. But now imagine that the concrete staircase is painted white and straight ahead the door is a glass door and to the left in the wall the wardrobe with sliding doors is built in.

Then I'm looking at a white wall, namely the underside of the stairs. Transparency is something else

Here is the adjusted Danwood 151W:

One home office facing the garden:


And one kitchen facing the garden:


Upstairs, it can certainly be a bit more orderly:


Then based on the Solution 151:



And another variant of the City Villa 138 from HC with a U-shaped staircase, although the hallway upstairs is already incredibly large:



But by now I think you can post so many ideas here, there will always be something to complain about, even if it’s just the general non-affinity for design aspects.