On which of these floor plans can we continue to build?

If you put the garage on the east side, then you can add a window to the ground floor on the west side, but the driveway will be a bit narrower.

Why exactly does the driveway become narrower on the east side? It’s basically the same on the left as on the right.

I understand the floor plan in a way that it is already oriented accordingly? So garage and entrance on the east side and then a 4 m green strip on the west?
I’m just wondering if the garage only starts after about 6 m of house length, then it already protrudes out of the 13.5 m deep development window. I don’t know if this complies with the justification for the development plan. A 9 m long garage would probably not be feasible then either.

The way I see it (just now), the garage is obligatorily prescribed on the west side for you and only in the designated area – it doesn’t look like 9 m to me anyway. Or is there more information on that?

Regarding the office: The furniture (which also serves as storage, especially a 1.5 m wide cabinet) that we want to put in there would fit, and the distance from the desk to the sideboard on the opposite side would be 90-95 cm, which is even more than I have in my employer’s office. It’s not a wellness oasis, but it meets my employer’s requirements.
...But we don’t need a wellness oasis either.

Yes, the office is not a wellness oasis and neither is the bathroom. But you want it to be perfect! Laugh!
In the end, you have a bunch of small niche rooms into which one has to cram oneself daily for a lifetime. Whether it was worse in an apartment before does not make it any better. The office is still okay – but it can’t hold that much junk.

But which wish should we give up?
I need the office to be allowed to work from home.
Unfortunately, the house has neither a gable nor a hip roof and therefore no additional storage space. That’s why a storage room makes sense from my point of view, right?

You presumably can’t give up anything. The problem is more that your space requirements are excessively larger than your budget. Normally, with this house size, the requirements and the development plan, you would build with a basement.

You can't look at the floor plans for your house neutrally. There are things that simply don't fit for everyone.

Thank you for the hint… I will keep that in mind.

Don't take this the wrong way, it's a matter of taste. But I've rarely seen such an ugly single-family house from the outside. A disguised Bauhaus style that totally misses the point of this architectural form.

The builder calls it Bauhaus style.

If you look at the standard floor plan in the exposé, the houses on the entrance side each have only the front door and above it the window of the hallway. On the garden side, there is then a gallery with a panoramic window.

Why is the driveway narrower again on the east side? It is basically the same on the left and right, isn’t it?

I probably expressed myself somewhat unclearly. If the garage is placed on the east side, then the ground floor on the west side can still get a window, but the driveway to the garage on the east side is a bit narrower due to the property boundary to house 11… see site plan.

As I (only just now) see it, the garage is strictly required on the west side for you and only in the intended area – it doesn't look like 9 m to me anyway. Or is there more info on this?

I already wrote something about the garage in the introductory thread:

In the development area, the private need for garages, carports, and parking spaces must be met with regard to the limited capacity of the access areas on the property itself. Garages, carports, and parking spaces are not to be distributed randomly and disorderly on the properties. Accordingly, they are only permitted within the buildable property areas and in the areas designated for garages, carports, and parking spaces. This prevents the impression of random development and specifically avoids the use of rear areas and boundary setbacks to the existing development by garages, carports, and parking spaces.

The drawn 6 m garage was originally planned on the west side. According to the depth of the development window, a 9 m garage would be possible. The architect said in the discussion that the garage could also be on the east side. If the 9 m garage were placed on the east side, it (or the annex) would protrude minimally beyond the eastern development window. The planning office agreed bilaterally.

Hello, I had also read the garage text. However, it does not say that the garage may also be located to the east or in another position. Unfortunately, the numbers on your site plan are all illegible - resolution too poor. Therefore difficult to assess.

I probably expressed myself a bit poorly. If you put the garage on the east side, then you can still give the ground floor a window on the west side, but the access to the garage on the east side is a bit narrower due to the property boundary with house 11 … see site plan.

Sorry, you’re just repeating what you already said. To put it differently, why is the access to neighbor 11 narrower than to neighbor 9? If neighbor 9 extends his garden fence forward, to me that’s equivalent to neighbor 11 doing the same. Or do you then have to reverse the turning circle to park?

I like the first floor plan better. I don't think the house looks bad from the outside - unlike some other statements here. What I can't quite understand are the partially, in my opinion, inappropriate comments about the ugliness of the house from the outside: it's all a matter of taste - and as I mentioned in another thread, at least NO ONE dictates to ME from the outside what I am supposed to like - and I apply the same to my comments on other projects. In this regard, some people here could really hold back a little (humility is a virtue, not a burden) - because it simply doesn't help and doesn't advance the OP in the slightest. In light of the sometimes acrimonious comments, I seriously wonder whether I will ever even post our planned floor plan and the house views. Apparently, (at least for now) it is not possible to expect factual comments (in terms of advantages and disadvantages; alternative options, etc.). I'll interpret it this way: If someone gets upset about the exterior view, the floor plan must be great.....

A disguised Bauhaus style that completely misses the point of this architectural form.

Oh, and you define that now? Have you ever heard of "further development" or "interpretation/variation of Bauhaus style"? The OP never said anywhere that they want to live in a house in the original Bauhaus style (which hardly exists today, by the way)..... And what's wrong with a, as you say, "disguised Bauhaus style" if the OP likes it? If we always want to discuss things here that only you yourself like, a) we won't get far (because you are not the center of the world) and b) that would be boring, wouldn't it? I am always glad when "my style" doesn't please everyone... Let's try to support the OP factually where it helps or can help.