chand1986
2017-12-13 10:03:50
- #1
- On the topic of credit and what it is for:
Basically, it can work out well to finance consumption on credit. But unlike investments, there is usually no asset that could secure the loan in case of emergency. It is a pure bet on the future. It can work out, but it doesn't have to.
- On the topic of 0% financing
Normally, when financing "at 0%" through a particular bank, you also have to take out insurance that protects the bank against payment default. If you include this in the purchase price, 0% quickly becomes 1.x%. Banks do not offer such models out of kindness. Profits are made on the insurances.
- specifically regarding the example from
Taking out a consumer loan during the construction of a house for a needed car to protect liquidity (money was theoretically available) is a special case that cannot be compared to ordinary consumer loans.
I would not agree that, with the same argument, the wedding celebration is financed with 15k. Wedding celebrations have an economic residual value of exactly 0; the loan is purely secured by the hopefully rosy future. I find that a no-go (please don’t take it personally) and definitely not recommended to emulate.
In summary: Consumer loans create debtors but little to no assets on their balance sheet. With such debts, you expose yourself to the employer's mercy. Freedom is something else.
A (good) investment loan creates assets alongside the debts that can secure the debts in case of emergency. Of course, that depends on the marketability of the investment—let’s say the house.
That is also the reason why I (personally) would have fewer qualms about taking out a large loan to finance a residential property in a sought-after city location than a relatively smaller loan for a single-family house in a rural area. Properties in sought-after cities always sell in case of emergency.
Basically, it can work out well to finance consumption on credit. But unlike investments, there is usually no asset that could secure the loan in case of emergency. It is a pure bet on the future. It can work out, but it doesn't have to.
- On the topic of 0% financing
Normally, when financing "at 0%" through a particular bank, you also have to take out insurance that protects the bank against payment default. If you include this in the purchase price, 0% quickly becomes 1.x%. Banks do not offer such models out of kindness. Profits are made on the insurances.
- specifically regarding the example from
Taking out a consumer loan during the construction of a house for a needed car to protect liquidity (money was theoretically available) is a special case that cannot be compared to ordinary consumer loans.
I would not agree that, with the same argument, the wedding celebration is financed with 15k. Wedding celebrations have an economic residual value of exactly 0; the loan is purely secured by the hopefully rosy future. I find that a no-go (please don’t take it personally) and definitely not recommended to emulate.
In summary: Consumer loans create debtors but little to no assets on their balance sheet. With such debts, you expose yourself to the employer's mercy. Freedom is something else.
A (good) investment loan creates assets alongside the debts that can secure the debts in case of emergency. Of course, that depends on the marketability of the investment—let’s say the house.
That is also the reason why I (personally) would have fewer qualms about taking out a large loan to finance a residential property in a sought-after city location than a relatively smaller loan for a single-family house in a rural area. Properties in sought-after cities always sell in case of emergency.