When the dream of the house bursts

  • Erstellt am 2017-12-06 17:04:34

HilfeHilfe

2017-12-13 13:54:34
  • #1


no, because they have to finance the money in advance (the 25%). also have employees, buildings, etc. pp

and often you can only collect the money in small pieces. you cannot speak of stupid and silly there.

a debt collection agency also does not get the cream of the crop of defaulting customers, but the leftovers. Accordingly, the "cheap" purchase of the claim.
 

Stivikivi

2017-12-13 14:02:06
  • #2


One gets insulted for earning too little, the other for earning too much

Funny world...
 

77.willo

2017-12-13 14:04:13
  • #3
But they do not collect 100% of the claims by far. For the majority of the "customers" there is nothing to get.
 

11ant

2017-12-13 14:24:16
  • #4

For the institution that does have that, it is also just a myth that it is a non-profit organization.
 

toxicmolotof

2017-12-13 15:02:47
  • #5
Now that's thin ice and OOOOT.

At least these NPOs do not pay dividends to anyone but generate their income for their own self-preservation. Without volunteers, many things would not be possible, and yes, there are also purpose businesses and GmbHs there for good reason.
 

Nordlys

2017-12-13 15:47:26
  • #6
Thank you. The constant criticizing of everyone who doesn't just want to get rich but wants to do something good has also annoyed me for a long time. No wonder they only call this journalism in Saxony "lying press." Every welfare organization, whether Diakonie, AWO, DRK, Caritas, or whatever else there is, has areas where they make a profit and areas where they spend more than they earn. That's how it has to be. Blood donation service plus, daycare operation minus. Integration projects plus, individual case assistance minus. Etc. Karsten
 
Oben