chand1986
2020-04-19 18:51:06
- #1
His argument is that if you replace the disturbing children with people with black skin, it would be racism.
But "disturbing children" achieve their effect through an activity, not through their appearance. That not only fails, it's not even a comparison.
Again: There is a framework, even if not clearly defined, in which the activities of children must be tolerated, even if one finds them disturbing. They are louder than adults. They are allowed to be.
But constantly yelling of one's own children at the highest dB level, shrugging it off as "natural" behavior and simply imposing it on the surroundings, speaks of poor judgment about what is acceptable in social coexistence and what is not. It lies outside the above-mentioned framework and, because of its impact on others, cannot simply be removed from discussion as a style of upbringing that supposedly ought to be a private matter.
The claim that one can only have a say if one has children of their own is a cheap knockdown argument. I don't have to perform work myself to judge the quality of the mere work result. Without being a carpenter, I recognize a bad cabinet. Without growing fruit, I can judge the quality of apples. And without having raised my own children, I can distinguish well-behaved children of others from less well-behaved ones and evaluate children's behavior as acceptable or not. If someone often cries, I hear that with my ears, not with my own children.
Whether their own parents would agree with me plays the tiniest role, because, pardon having to say this: Nobody is less objective in judging a child than their own parents. I can establish this with 100% certainty after long caregiving experience. And nature has certainly arranged it this way for good reason, so no accusation, just an observation.