I didn't mean that the static would become problematic: indeed, on the upper floor there are load-bearing walls above non-load-bearing or no walls and similar apprentice jokes, but that doesn't matter: with a truss roof everything up there is drywall anyway, so that's forgotten with a tired smile.
What I meant is: the structural engineer will be the first one who, after 40 pages of stagnation in discussion, even twists a perm rod in or dyes a streak. Maybe I'm wrong, and this time it's the boiler repairman, anyway: before this moves from the floor plan drawer to one of the specialist planners, no significant drive will come into it.
I can tell at first glance from the floor plans that they were not created using the additive method (arrange rooms and then tie them together with exterior walls), but using the subtractive method (take the base area and insert interior walls). And I can also see at first glance that the client and the builder see no difference between a dressing room and a wall placed inside the bedroom in perfect harmony. Then that's fine and everyone involved is happy.
I would just like to add for the readers: "dear children, please do not imitate this." Because, methodically, you limit the scope of possible results to the "House of Nicholas" and only allow yourself the choice between the flavors Nikolaus Bauhaus and Nikolaus Tuscany.