uh .. page after page you point out the special problem of your loud subwoofers, the noise levels of washing machines/dryers etc., and then you want to put the subwoofers right back in the middle between the bedrooms with that proposal?
I’m just saying first what’s important to me. What I can’t say so quickly is what priority each thing has. That the subwoofer, if possible, does not border a child’s room has a high priority. But if the living room is very far away from the terrace, that bothers me even more. Therefore, I think in this case, the living room should go upstairs.
No, that’s not what he wants.
He actually wants the living room upstairs (in the back)
Girls, we play the games. But are you aware that nothing will be implemented here?!
Chris wants 150%, but no compromises. He is a man who doesn’t think further than being surrounded by his subs in the evening.
The woman is there for laundry, and much more. But for some reason we are dealing with Chris here, who feels threatened about his chill place if the house is logically and practically designed so that it works within the family.
Now you’re really bullying me hard. I am absolutely willing to make compromises. For example, I already did by placing the office upstairs. I usually spend 32 hours a week in the office. One day I possibly drive to the company. If there is a place where I spend a lot of time, it’s the office. Unfortunately, it’s not a chill place. :-(
If first subwoofers, kids facing south, dryers, and short house connections have to be brought under one roof: then in my estimation waiting for Godot.
You see this wrong, the generous dining table probably confuses you.
It is far less dramatic in reality than in the drawing, and also more subtle with a hip roof than with a gable roof of the same pitch.
Anyway, definitely with a standardized garage – a possible offset in parallels works much better in a carport.
Ceterum censeo: a bungalow is a house form whose domain – apart from the special case of a family member in a wheelchair – is the couple with completed family planning (whether childless, children already out of the house, or the willingness to move in case of offspring). But the need for a child’s room on the ground floor automatically brings additional attic space with it and is thus its strongest argument against not converting the attic. With such small children (2 years / 7 months) I still see a shared room as sufficient for quite a while and the option to later have them avoid each other on different floors (or then move the bedroom upstairs) as worth considering.
Our family planning is complete, my wife would still like one more but she respects my wish. Exactly right, with such small children it can still be a long time that they share a room. For now, I’ll take one child’s room as an office.
Redrew the plan to 11.5 x 16 – just for fun:
I really, really like the floor plan now. I don’t mind the idea of the 2nd storage room at all. Criticism? The children’s rooms are a bit elongated but that’s not so bad! Subwoofer by the bedroom? I can live with that! Oh no, the stairs are missing. We still have to somehow fit them in. If the house becomes a little longer because of that, it wouldn’t be a problem. 0.5m would be okay if that’s enough?
I saved mine..
Subwoofer...check
Washing machine...check
Short lines...check
South children...check
Good floor plan but I like kaho674’s version better.