Bungalow 148m² site planning / floor plan planning

Yes, with non-rectangular variants you could kill some frogs.

But the BU can't do that!

Yvonne's idea would need to be redrawn neatly (i.e. properly). So far I find it the best - just don't know if the bathroom and the utility room will become very small...

I tried: bathroom and utility room become tubes... maybe again later...

That is not possible for the BU! I tried: Bathroom and utility room become hoses... maybe later again...

Yes, I also think it would overwhelm the BU. :/

In this case, I would also swap the living room and kitchen.

uh .. page after page you point out the special problem of your loud subwoofers, the volumes of washing machines/dryers, etc., and then you want to place the subwoofers back right between the bedrooms with the proposal?

uh .. page after page you point out the special problem of your loud subwoofers, the volumes of washing machines/dryers etc., and then with the proposal you want to put the subwoofers right in the middle between the bedrooms again?

No, he doesn't want that. He actually wants the living room upstairs (at the back)

I personally would prefer living room and kitchen in the back.

Girls, we are playing the games. But are you aware that nothing will be implemented here?! Chris wants 150%, but no compromises. He is a man who does not think beyond being surrounded by his subs in the evening. The woman is there to do the laundry, and much more besides. But for some reason, we are dealing here with Chris, who fears for his chill spot if the house is logically and practically designed to work within the family.

I'm curious to see what will come out of this in the end.

If you first have to bring subwoofers, southern children, tumble dryers, and short house connections under one roof: then in my estimation, it's waiting for Godot.

In your floor plan, I find the living room very small.

You're mistaken there, probably the generous dining table confuses you.

The gable roof is much more charming and modern than the tall hip roof, which is not proportional to the building at all.

In reality, this is far less dramatic than in the drawing, and even with hip roofs, it's subtler than with gable roofs of the same pitch.

I would simply position the house at an angle with a standardized garage,

Anyway, definitely with a standardized garage – any potential parallel offset settles much more advantageously in the carport in between.

Ceterum censeo: a bungalow is a house type whose domain – apart from the special case of a wheelchair-using family member – is the couple with completed family planning (whether childless, children already out of the house, or willingness to move in case of more children). But the need for a child’s room on the ground floor automatically brings additional attic floor space with it and is thus its own strongest argument against not converting the attic. With such small children (2 years / 7 months), I also see a shared room as sufficient for quite a while and consider the option of later separating them on different floors so they can avoid each other (or then moving the bedroom upstairs) worth considering.

I resized the version to 11.5 x 16 again - just for fun: