Teemoe86
2020-06-03 08:22:25
- #1
I read through this topic last night in bed (We are about to build a house and so I did get some "doubts about an air-to-water heat pump/brine-to-water heat pump") and also found articles that I consider trustworthy. The Association of Private Builders apparently conducted a study with/at Weberhaus and took samples. Elevated/too high values were reportedly found quite frequently in heat pumps there.
According to the article, heat pumps should generally not be used for hot water preparation or an additional heating element should be used so that the water is regularly heated to 65°C or, even better, a heat pump should be used that can already reach 65°C on its own. Of course, heating elements cause high energy costs – to what extent heat pumps that naturally reach 65°C make sense in a single-family home – no idea.
In general, I am currently also uncertain whether air-to-water heat pumps / brine-to-water heat pumps + subsidies / or rather gas boilers, which easily and efficiently reach 65°C and cost significantly less. (The article states for "general" single-family homes investment/annual costs for air-to-water heat pumps 13,000/1066, brine-to-water heat pumps 23,000/793, gas boilers 5,500/830)
In addition, there are the costs for heating up to 65°C weekly, which are apparently not included.
However, since I only found this article (Association of Private Builders) and am still educating myself – how do you see it? A photovoltaic system could possibly save part of the running costs of a heat pump but also costs money. With the brine-to-water heat pump, you can get 35% from BAFA, thus paying about 15,000 instead of 23,000. The legionella question remains.
According to the article, heat pumps should generally not be used for hot water preparation or an additional heating element should be used so that the water is regularly heated to 65°C or, even better, a heat pump should be used that can already reach 65°C on its own. Of course, heating elements cause high energy costs – to what extent heat pumps that naturally reach 65°C make sense in a single-family home – no idea.
In general, I am currently also uncertain whether air-to-water heat pumps / brine-to-water heat pumps + subsidies / or rather gas boilers, which easily and efficiently reach 65°C and cost significantly less. (The article states for "general" single-family homes investment/annual costs for air-to-water heat pumps 13,000/1066, brine-to-water heat pumps 23,000/793, gas boilers 5,500/830)
In addition, there are the costs for heating up to 65°C weekly, which are apparently not included.
However, since I only found this article (Association of Private Builders) and am still educating myself – how do you see it? A photovoltaic system could possibly save part of the running costs of a heat pump but also costs money. With the brine-to-water heat pump, you can get 35% from BAFA, thus paying about 15,000 instead of 23,000. The legionella question remains.