A rather unfair argument to equate a personal mistake with complete failure in studies and career, that is not a factual discussion. I do not find any real arguments or factual information about Legionella in single-family homes in your post apart from the arbitrary percentages (where do your 75 and 100 percent come from?).
By the way, it is not my method, but common practice and without "maybe." You continuously get new Legionella through tap water. You can only keep them away permanently if you keep the water temperature above 68°C, which is uneconomical with heat pumps (and the storage losses are high). Otherwise, there is no 100% prevention. Heating at regular intervals is also nothing more than a minimization because you never kill 100% (just google the studies), and at the first draw, you get new ones through fresh water. The deciding factor is thus the concentration. If the water exchange rate is high enough, that is completely sufficient. If the entire water is exchanged every 2 days, what should a weekly heating bring? You heat water with a Legionella concentration that is basically at tap water level and shortly afterward it is exchanged anyway. Incidentally, when heating the storage tank, long-unused pipes etc. are not heated, so circulation lines and rarely used showers (you get infected particularly quickly here through the water droplets in the air) are actually the major risk of infection!
The comparison with hospitals is also wrong, this is about single-family homes and the infrastructure, pipe lengths, etc., as well as the requirements in hospitals (where there are weakened persons), are probably quite different.