Dear , I have researched so much. I have spoken with 5 architects and our planner, a civil engineer. No one has ever called the buildable area a building window. It was always referred to as "building lines," "building boundaries," "buildable area," "building restrictions," etc., so I didn’t get the feeling that there is even a standard term for it. Anyway, it’s just a word, and clearly, I have only been dealing with the whole building topic since about October, so please forgive a little ignorance on my part (which is also much less important for the outcome than knowledge about other things).
Thank you for saying I don’t come across as arrogant. However, your (second-to-last) comment does come across a tiny bit condescending to me, which I find a bit unfortunate. I take all tips and concerns seriously; that’s how I even got to planning smaller again. Statements like "if you don’t know that, it won’t work anyway" (that’s kind of how your comment reads) unfortunately don’t help me at all. And they certainly don’t make me want to shelve the project right away. By the way, the real expert is, as I explained in detail in my second post, my father-in-law: a trained plumber, building materials salesman, huge network of craftsmen and professionals, and constantly building himself.
So, I’ve learned something again: you can, quite correctly, take the building window from the site plan in my first post. We won’t have any problem with the carport, here is the corresponding excerpt from the Berlin building regulations:
Garages.and.outbuildings.without.living.rooms.and.fireplaces.and.with.a.wall.height.of.no.more.than.3.meters.may.be.built.without.distance.spaces.also.immediately.on.the.property.boundary..These.buildings.built.on.or.in.direct.proximity.to.the.property.boundary.may.along.their.own.property.boundary.have.a.length.of.9.meters.and.in.total.along.all.property.boundaries.a.length.of.15.meters.should.not.be.exceeded..Thus.garages.or.outbuildings.are.allowed.also.in.corner.situations.at.two.or.more.property.boundaries.
With the budget, if it goes well, more like 80 sqm is possible rather than 135.
That’s what the first architect we saw told us, more or less. But that doesn’t mean it’s not possible. Counterexample: a friend of mine built a city villa with a local general contractor two years ago. 163 m², precast concrete elements, not a bad finish (wood-look tiles, high-quality tiles in the bathrooms, partial brick cladding on the facade, floor-to-ceiling showers, solid wood staircase). They did the painting and installed the interior doors themselves as own contribution. In total, they paid €219,000 for it (I assume without the foundation slab).
Why I think we can manage it is explained quite extensively in my second post, I believe. It is still possible that we will get an additional financial boost from parents/in-laws (my boyfriend is the sole heir of his parents, who also own land in the Berlin outskirts). So for now, no reasons not to pursue the project.
Whoever wants to talk about floor plans again: here I have created some new variants, a bit smaller but still with our preferred, rather straightforward stair shapes. Please feel free to tell me which variant you like best (and why). I’m looking forward to your opinions. (Unfortunately not dimensioned, Roomsketcher doesn’t make that easy, but the furniture is exactly ours and all to scale; wall thicknesses and stairs are also mostly as calculated by the planner, only with the load-bearing walls we are sometimes unsure whether they will be 24 or 17.5 cm thick).
