la.schnute
2020-03-16 22:03:22
- #1
Aha!!!!
So what now? La.Schnute still had a cute country house in mind in the first post, also asked if the house as planned doesn’t look too massive for a country house, and meanwhile the focus has rather shifted to the modern look.
Just as unfinished, this is how some really good and well-founded advice is met here.
Then just leave it. You have an idea, do as you want.
I also mentioned at one point that I’m not exactly sure if “country house” is the right word, because under this term you often find clearly – as you say – “cuter” houses (in the sense of more ornate). I mean a modernly interpreted country house, to illustrate, here are two photos attached. And true: I know pretty well what I want. Which I basically think is good. So my main concern in this forum was about detailed questions, right. Not about the rough concept.
Whether this is feasible with our financially tight budget, you are welcome to express these worries. The good thing is that through the self-organized building (still with wholesale material prices) we can better adapt the planning during construction and react relatively flexibly. If it then doesn’t suffice for tile A or toilet B, it will simply be cheaper models. Also, I mentioned several times that in an emergency we would get a financial boost from family, which at the beginning is not planned in the 230,000. You are especially welcome and should express budget concerns CONCRETELY, i.e. referring to the design of individual areas. It will not be the missing walls in the open ground floor, nor the relatively small footprint, nor the rectangular building shape. Nor the fact that it should be “modern”. Modern doesn’t automatically mean expensive, but sometimes reduced and simple. It might be the windows. Therefore, I asked for concrete suggestions on that. Where would you save one? How would you arrange them? And yes, I hoped and still hope for suggestions in keeping the basic idea, as for example , , and some others have done. Many thanks again for that!!! By the way, the Lokstedt cost 250,000 €, which I find a very good price for the year of construction 2016. Honestly, I would have guessed higher.
What bothers me about the facades is only the Hanseatic rigid rhythm of the windows (and the numerical overdose of floor-to-ceiling ones).
Yes, you wrote something like this at the beginning. How would you loosen the rigid rhythm? I really can’t think of much anymore... Floor-to-ceiling, sure you can only do half-high windows upstairs. That will definitely not be at the top of our cut list if it gets too expensive, but also not at the bottom either. I will also consult my architect friend these days about window arrangement (and possibly savings) if we can still somehow meet and there is no curfew soon.
Otherwise: sigh, I’m really tired of eternal justifying... so, , I think soon it’s over and you can switch back to raw food or something. In two years I will either crawl to the cross (although that apparently only happens when the kids are teenagers and you have a long long living experience in a single-family house) or post my dream house here.