The building surveyor said, "You have such a beautiful plot; it deserves better than a boring cookie-cutter house" – and maybe she’s right.
That’s why we are considering whether an architect might be what we need. Someone who shows us what might still be possible.
I’m in favor of that too.
Of course, we have ideas. We have already looked at many houses. And we have actually found a floor plan at KMH that appeals to us.
We don’t have high demands regarding the architecture. Precisely because we lack the visions.
What kind of ideas would those be? – Who is KMH? – A plot with its individuality significantly helps to organize visions.
May I ask something about that? If you don’t have craftsmen on hand, wouldn’t the problem be that as a private customer you stand at the very end of the food chain? So a general contractor (GU) can activate their long-known craftsmen faster?
Whether GU or architect or both, craftsmen always prefer to take the job from someone they know. You know what you’re getting – Persil
And GU isn’t always just standard? There are small regional (family) companies here where, for example, the managing director is an architect and probably plans individually enough.
A GU architect will – even if he owns the company – always pay attention to two things: first, not encouraging the client to get lost in constantly changing special whim fantasies; and second, not comparing his all-inclusive planning price to a “five-star single room private patient” level of effort. So even without a draftsman blandness guarantee, GU planning tends to be simpler. Or phrased as an 11th commandment motto: “Where the freelance architect makes a detailed drawing, the GU planner is to be expected to use drywall.”
The standard construction company builds ONE house, the architect designs YOUR house. Then a GU can also build it according to your architect’s plans.
If the architect designs and supervises construction, the GU as contractor for execution is at least not a bad choice when the architect knows him.