Installation of a gas heating system in new construction 2023/2024

  • Erstellt am 2023-04-11 14:47:10

Bausparfuchs

2023-04-29 23:46:19
  • #1
Germany's claim has always been a special one. We were progressive, liberal, open to the world, and in a certain way the beacon of this world. Groundbreaking innovations, export world champion, leading in large parts of the economy.

Proud of our education system, our healthcare system, our skilled workers, etc.

However, we have experienced a rapid crash. I see us standing before a huge heap of rubble. I don't even want to go into details because everyone can form their own insights and thoughts about it. And, as always, there will now be enough people who simply do not see it or do not want to accept it.

Now subjecting everything to an ideological climate turnaround is, in my opinion, wrong. No comprehensible or reasonable decisions are being made, with which large parts of the population can identify. No. At all costs, they try to re-educate us, create guilt and fear. Meanwhile, we are paralyzed by incompetence and bureaucracy. Nothing works anymore in Germany. No matter what you touch.

The infrastructure is an absolute disaster. Electricity, communication, traffic—everything is outdated.

In recent days, I have seen videos from German influencers who traveled to Japan or China. When you see these images and impressions, we have long since lost connection. While we still haven't managed to implement a unified payment system for electric vehicles here, batteries in vehicles on Chinese highways are swapped out in 2 minutes.

But we are already working on the next tightening. Now the EU wants to ban fossil heating systems that have less than 115 percent efficiency. Is that even physically possible? So we get more energy out of a heater than we put in?


    [*]According to the Ecodesign Regulation for space heaters and combination heaters, new heaters with an efficiency below 115 percent should no longer be allowed on the market. This means that for 100 percent energy supplied, at least 115 percent usable heat must be produced in order for the heating system to be marketed.

So no worries. The nonsense continues!

This should not become a word for Sunday.
 

chand1986

2023-04-30 05:20:38
  • #2
This is called the greenhouse effect. Venus has a very dense atmosphere, mostly consisting of greenhouse gases and an extreme cloud cover. That is why it is so hot there. It seems to me that this is exactly not a good example for… um yes, for what exactly again?
 

Benutzer 1001

2023-04-30 07:18:34
  • #3

The masks even worked very, very well, any doctor will confirm that to you. Now that they no longer have to be worn, we are paying the price. As parents, we feel that none of our children, including ourselves, have ever been this sick so often.



You don’t learn: the video of an influencer is never the truth, it is a snapshot that is even staged for that purpose.
But yes, our system is on the brink of collapse, but that is not because of the environment, rather because of our system, which, to put it bluntly, needs a master electrician just to change a fuse.




By adding, for example, solar energy or combining it with heat pumps that produce 4-5 kW of heating power from 1 kW of electricity.
 

guckuck2

2023-04-30 07:31:16
  • #4
Heat pumps, of course. From 1, they make 4. But condensing technology also lies mathematically above 100%. I had 110% in mind, but I suspect by now that also exceeds the mentioned limit, especially when supplemented with renewable energy.
 

Bookstar87

2023-04-30 08:19:45
  • #5
The majority are constantly sick because the shot weakens the immune system. The masks add to that. I agree with you, the masks had numerous negative effects. But unfortunately, no meaningful infection protection.
 

RotorMotor

2023-04-30 08:32:33
  • #6
COVID makes you sick, Long COVID makes you sick for a long time. And that affects many people. How do you come to the conclusion that the vaccine harms you (except in individual cases)?

And which study says that masks don't help. In this meta-study, only a few studies about Corona are cited. In the first two linked ones, a reduction is mentioned. Have you read (and understood?) the studies?

And again the most important question: what does this have to do with gas heating?
 

Similar topics
08.11.2013Electricity at the house connection for provider - Installation of server cabinet10
08.08.2016Connection costs for telecom, cable, electricity10
03.07.2017Are the costs for the electricity house connection justified?10
21.02.2018Heating with electricity - infrared heating? Experiences wanted17
15.05.2018Water, gas, and electricity - disconnection and reconnection?10
17.02.2019Dimensioning of house connection electricity/gas/water11
28.06.2020Connection for network power supply very expensive?!23
07.03.2022How to connect an outdoor camera? LAN, power or battery25
14.02.2024Bafa funding for heat pumps will be discontinued as of 31.12.2020.510
14.05.2023How did you install your heat pumps?15
04.06.2014How can one save electricity?21
13.02.2017With which heating system can I heat cheaply using electricity?11
08.02.2022How complicated are heat pumps in practical operation?78
09.04.2023Planned throttling of wallboxes and heat pumps34
30.07.2023Heat pump theft protection - Covered by building insurance?36

Oben