Installation of a gas heating system in new construction 2023/2024

One must distinguish between media presentation and expert discourse.

That the lockdowns would be bad for children was already agreed upon in the professional field of developmental research before the lockdowns.

Most people are not even aware of how poor science communication is through established media.

This has nothing to do with the publishers but with the fact that you can count the competent science journalists in Germany on one hand. Without needing all the fingers.

And then MayLab or the Gates-financed Hirschhausen come along and abuse people's trust by telling them something about "science" and "facts." It is then "checked" by Faktenfuchs or Volksverpetzer.

Before criticizing the world, one should first ban the aforementioned forever. So many little sheep told me back then that they would rather believe the aforementioned, and now they have also realized that they were only lied to. Whether intentional or not makes no difference to me; that is only interesting for courts.

Before criticizing the world, one should first ban the aforementioned forever.

Weren't you still for freedom of speech two posts ago? Apart from the fact that MaiLab has explained and shown how science works. As a method of gaining knowledge. Such a thing does not exist at all in newspapers – mostly because journalists simply can’t do it. Anyone in Germany who wants to learn something about this is not served by traditional media at all. Of course, one starts with the realization that one still has to learn oneself... By the way, you can google the raw numbers from the PEI without any other media prefiltering them for you. Of course, you have to do the calculations yourself then.

Most people just can't manage to google the numbers from the PEI. When 70 out of 1000 side effects remain and then 4, no one asks where the other cases have gone….

And on the topic of newspapers and who was first, the research was not done properly: After #der grüne Sumpf trended on Twitter for days and weeks, more and more leading media reported on it discreetly, and now the topic has also been picked up by the Union, the public broadcaster followed suit. And shows a report about the clan-like structures.

The pressure became too great. That's how it works nowadays.

Among the 20% interested in Corona investigations: unfortunately no pressure behind it.

Regarding the 20% interested in Corona review: unfortunately no pressure behind it.

I see that a bit differently: There are camps that want a review, where it is already clear beforehand what the outcome should be. Look at our : He already knows for a long time what happened how and by whom and why. It was in the "Welt". Now the official review just has to yield exactly that. Otherwise, it is only proven again how we are all f*****.

Anyone who is open has to get the raw numbers as much as possible, think for themselves, and expose themselves to different positions on the matter. And then also reflect on themselves - because the wrong positions can always include one's own.

Most people just can't manage to google the numbers from the PEI.

And of those who manage it, some can't embed absolute numbers into relative contexts. But whose responsibility is that?

Maybe the Querdenkers here want to start a Corona follow-up thread? Then they don't have to discuss their problems in every thread that has nothing to do with it. You can also send them to me via PM, I will safely keep them for you. I would be very grateful for that!