Kati and unfortunately you can only understand that if you belong to a minority for the first time. I never understood the debate about it before because I always thought: why, here you can say whatever you want. No, unfortunately you can only do that as long as you have a certain opinion, if you have a different one, it's very quickly over with saying what you want and think. But you don't notice that if you think like everyone else. And the topics for that are becoming more diverse, now it's climate.
Climate is a great example of where opinion ends and denial of facts begins. In the climate issue there are different camps. It ranges from "we are so frustrated we glue ourselves to the street," to "something should be done about it as long as it doesn't cost or restrict me," to "we have more urgent problems." Just like there are people who find oranges rather sweet, others find them rather bitter, or rather sour. And then there are those who stand up and claim that man-made climate change doesn't exist at all. That is now simply refutable as a fact. That is like me standing up and saying "Oranges are stones," and getting upset that my "opinion" is not respected. Because the remaining 95% of the mainstream sheep, who otherwise don't agree on anything, have come to the consensus that the thing about stones is nonsense. The same analogy applies to the pandemic stuff. There was also a range of opinions from-to, and then there were the reality-deniers.