Installation of a gas heating system in new construction 2023/2024

So do you now have the concrete example you claimed proves the indoctrination in schools, or not?

Of course, the critical engagement with content is the central aspect under which all sorts of ideological writings are read in schools.

In social studies classes in Saxony-Anhalt, students from the 8th grade onwards can learn to divide people into "discriminated" and "non-discriminated." Well, but you teach physics, so it's a perfect world there.

Ok, and what do you think is indoctrination here? The fact that this division is even conveyed? The categories? Or the specific groupings? From my point of view, none of this on the worksheet is indoctrination. It would become indoctrination if the teaching staff, for example, did not allow any discussion about the specific classification and dismissed the question of whether a white person or a Christian is also discriminated against in certain milieus as basically idiotic.

Exactly … who listed these categories as if they were in the dictionary? Yes, and I would really like to know what the answer would be if a student writes: I don’t think that white men (Kategorie hier austauschbar) are not discriminated against. Surely that would be a 1.0 then …

In social studies classes in Saxony-Anhalt, students from the 8th grade onwards can learn to categorize people into "discriminated" and "non-discriminated." Well, but you teach physics, so it's a perfect world

o_O There are actually groups that are frequently discriminated against in our society?? And these are supposed to be minorities, not rich white middle-aged men?? Shocking realization o_O

Exactly ... who listed these categories as if they were in the Duden? Yes, and I would really like to know what the answer would be if a student writes: I don't think that white men (category interchangeable here) are not discriminated against. That would probably be a 1.0 then ...

Well, name an example where white men are discriminated against?

Well, give me an example where white men are discriminated against?

I keep encountering discussions about whether support programs for minorities and quotas are not inherently discriminatory against those who are not supported. For example, when "applications from xy are preferentially treated." When two people with otherwise similar qualifications apply, and suddenly gender becomes the selection criterion because there is not enough diversity. On the one hand, I think that a diverse workforce at all levels is definitely beneficial for a company. On the other hand, it certainly leaves a sour taste when that was the selection criterion in an individual case. And sometimes it seems to reinforce prejudices, in the sense of "a woman as a manager? Well, she probably only got the position because of the quota" (which leads to the assumption that she is less capable). I don’t have a good solution for this either and sometimes think maybe this is a temporary evil that must be tolerated for a while on the way to a fairer world. But it doesn’t feel ideal.