Installation of a gas heating system in new construction 2023/2024

  • Erstellt am 2023-04-11 14:47:10

KarstenausNRW

2023-04-27 12:47:05
  • #1
Yes, out of necessity (and still, half of the apartments were heated with coal or similar until 1990. You probably can’t remember the Forster floor heaters... They burned whatever was available at the time.). There was neither money nor technology in the GDR. But there was an endless supply of lignite. And burning it was easy. Yes, district heating was installed out of necessity.
 

KarstenausNRW

2023-04-27 12:59:13
  • #2
The "small citizen receiving basic income" lives in the energetically poor old apartment and probably produces more CO2 due to the old oil heating and poor insulation than "the rich" can produce with his Tesla (charged by the photovoltaic system on the KfW 40-55 and geothermal heated house) and his otherwise lifestyle. Not to mention the climate-damaging purchases of the low-income earner compared to the sustainably and ecologically produced foods of the upper class. Exaggerated, but maybe it stimulates one or the other brain cell in you to start thinking...
 

kati1337

2023-04-27 13:06:13
  • #3


Basically, I agree with both - you don’t have to like all opinions, and a democracy can also handle dissenting views, that’s the beauty of it. Ironically, it’s those who always shout “you should be allowed to say that” who don’t realize that it’s only possible to say what they do in their (often criticized) democracy. They should try behaving like this in totalitarian states - I believe most would quickly remove “friend of Russia” from their list.

But when I read something like: To my eyes, that hardly has anything to do with opinion anymore. If I have to use such harsh labeling to prove I swim against the current in every respect, then that’s probably a case best handled by a psychologist.
 

Snowy36

2023-04-27 20:39:36
  • #4
Oh, I would really like to know in what way his fear of vaccination has endangered you or others? Have you completely overlooked the debate about protecting others etc. over the last weeks and months or what? I find it shocking how dogmatic some people can be with their opinions. And anyone who thinks differently and even says so is out. So anyone who still tells that story after so many scandals have emerged now and it is clear that the children had to stay home completely for nothing cannot be helped anymore. That is division at its finest.
 

Snowy36

2023-04-27 20:43:05
  • #5

Kati, and unfortunately you can only understand that if you belong to a minority for the first time. I never understood the debate before because I always thought: here you can say whatever you want. No, unfortunately you can only as long as you hold a certain opinion; if you have a different one, it's very quickly over with saying what you want and think. But you don't notice that if you think like everyone else.

And the topics for that are becoming more diverse, now it's climate.
 

Bookstar87

2023-04-27 20:53:45
  • #6
Fascism, fake news and state crimes, especially against children and unvaccinated people, was that. People were endangered by profit-hungry and/or incompetent politicians. That you still defend these atrocities is disgusting. It is unacceptable and mocks the victims.
 
Oben