How did you resolve disagreements with your partner?

  • Erstellt am 2019-05-01 21:52:43

rick2018

2019-05-06 09:29:10
  • #1
Sorry Nordlys, I share many of your views unconditionally but a clear regulation is necessary, reasonable and not a waste of money depending on the situation. On the contrary: if there is not much yet, the fees are quite low. Fees correspond in amount to the certificate of inheritance. So you pay now or the heirs later.
 

rick2018

2019-05-06 09:33:34
  • #2
I believe the issue was not about establishing clear financial structures in a relationship but that the financially stronger person automatically always has the decision-making power.
 

Farilo

2019-05-06 09:34:51
  • #3

Then you are the absolute exception!

Because here in the forum, most have been happily married for 50 years and really share everything!
And when two are just freshly together, money and materialism don’t matter at all and everything is pooled.

If she or he brings 1 million into the marriage or the other party nothing, they don’t care here either. Everything belongs to both and in case of a breakup one gives the other everything, because husband/wife is free from material things and everyone is fair.
 

rick2018

2019-05-06 09:48:59
  • #4
Even in a community of accrued gains, the property owned before marriage is protected in the event of separation. The same applies to inheritances. They do not automatically get included. Additionally, you can secure this through a prenuptial agreement, etc. It’s more about the partnership. And it’s just not that if I always pull the "money card" and thereby overpower the other. Everything was clearly arranged for us before we got married. Ideally, you never need the documents again. If things go badly, everything is fixed and on a basis where there was mutual understanding. I am a fan of clear regulations. However, these should not be one-sided (e.g., mutual desire for children, the woman stays at home taking care of upbringing, household... allowing the man full-time work, etc.). Such things should be considered and not just who gets how much in their account each month.
 

Altai

2019-05-06 09:56:27
  • #5
Most people hesitate to even bring up during the romantic phase: what if that changes? Because no one wants to admit that the relationship might fail later, even with the best intentions. And when it does come to that, all hell breaks loose... Only those who have already had bad experiences themselves or have witnessed them very closely in others make arrangements. A little general life wisdom, also in financial matters, would certainly do many people, especially women, some good. Example: buying a car, my ex wanted "us" to buy a new family car together. Since we weren't married, it could only belong to one person – him, of course. The life wisdom in this case lies in knowing that if you don't arrange anything else, it's HIS car, not OURS, no matter who put how much into the pot for payment. How to deal with it then is left to the respective couple. Many just lack this knowledge.
 

berny

2019-05-06 09:59:53
  • #6


In case this is supposed to be irony: Quite unsuccessful (my assessment). The original question was: How did you resolve disagreements? Money was not mentioned at all at first. Besides, there are more people like Nordlys: We have also for ages shared all accounts, portfolios, safe deposit boxes, and now finally also the house together. It has worked very well for over 30 years; we don’t even think about it. And disagreements about details: They probably exist always and everywhere, otherwise you would be living all alone on an island...
 
Oben