I congratulate everyone who either has the general contractor or an architect who thinks along and brings their own ideas for the floor plan.
I fear that only relatively few building owners wander here. Most building owners will discuss the floor plans with their family and colleagues and then build directly. The big awakening only comes later when everything is already set in concrete and you experience the problems firsthand. Your problem is that you want to stay "small". In the standard GC designs, you simply make the house 20 sqm larger and the problem "dissolves".
At GC1 we had a trained architect as a planner, whose designs were beautiful at first glance but very impractical upon closer consideration – too design-obsessed. GC2 only had a draftsman whose designs in my eyes were just mutated variants of already built houses. It was full of angled walls, recesses, etc. Everything that didn’t fit was made to fit.
What I want to get at: It was a long and rocky road!
I fussed over my floor plan for 6 months (I hardly dare say it) and the floor plan is just plain 08/15. I totally blocked myself. But now it is what it is. Alternatively, I could have calmly hired a "real" architect. Today I would gladly pay a generous fee to a good architect.
Yep, we were there live. Sometimes the charm lies especially in simplicity. Just because it has worked x1000 times doesn’t mean it’s bad – at least if it suits the plot.
You get what you pay for. Except for a few exceptions here in the forum, everyone wants to get the maximum house with the given budget. Generous fees for architects are not planned – the GC is supposed to do that for free. It’s the same system as expecting an independent consultation from bank "advisors" without wanting to pay for it.
In sum, however, I now also recognize similarities with our design. Just keep going and don’t give up. We also needed a year from first contact to signature with what felt like 20 design revisions.