Newly built single-family house approx. 220 sqm, 2nd design city villa

I would experiment a bit with the staircase. It is positioned in such a way that the hallway upstairs and the narrow cloakroom look like leftover pieces. If the closet and staircase downstairs were swapped, the whole thing would look more spacious. You want a spacious villa. I think that’s fine. But the overall impression is ruined by narrow spots. Kitchen aside from being unergonomic and a counter would be better than this kitty table. If I remember correctly, this kitchen is far away from the previous one. There are also a lot of windows missing there. The open plan living area. Have you furnished it? You wanted a fireplace with seating independent of the TV area; does everything fit there? Upstairs the narrow hallway to the children’s rooms feels cramped, although such a teenager wing has something. The orientation of the children’s rooms is for me a no-go. What do you plan for the bedroom? The master bathroom is small and functional in relation to the bedroom and the dressing room. I would let a professional handle the planning. State your wishes and they should manage the balancing act between individuality and good marketability.

I also like to hang my suits outside for airing with this background because I don't send them to the dry cleaner every time.
For that, the balcony has THE perfect size.

...but with the west/weather side misplanned.

Then they don’t have to constantly go through the bedroom or the bathroom.

... and then hang in the evening/night virtually in front of the parents' area? That’s basically like wall-to-wall.

You don’t need construction knowledge to imagine your dream kitchen and know what you want.

But that’s exactly why the forum exists—to point out, for example, the ergonomic triangle in kitchen planning. If you write: ergonomic triangle, the OP probably doesn’t even know what it means or discounts it. If you say it’s dysfunctional, they can still ask. Although the dysfunctionality was already mentioned and discussed in the first draft—the draft here again includes similar "mistakes." Often in this forum, it’s like the man puts a lot of thought into the planning (using CAD or Excel knowledge in the planning), while the woman is rather active on Pinterest (of course, it can also be the other way around).
Regarding the workspace in the bedroom: this may still be generously designed here with the panoramic window, but I would have thought that one knows that electrical installations have no place in the bedroom if one can afford it, and that even a bunch of ironing laundry in the corner behind the door leads many people to poor sleep.

Obvious: the drawn-in cat table stands in the middle of the passage... natural light is missing at the workspace as well as at the cat table, the right-hand corner of the island interferes with maneuvering. The chimney is on the outer wall and stacks upward (not visible if the program can’t draw chimneys). Heat from the fireplace is no longer felt anywhere, for the TV you turn your head wherever the sofa is set up.

The forum or the individual (myself included) can of course go into great detail every time and explain every aspect, but often it isn’t read or is dismissed. If the OP is interested, they can always ask why and how something didn’t work well. And not everything has to be wrong just because it’s criticized.
If you exactly know what you want and how it should be implemented, if you can assess your own knowledge and that of the architect or partner very well, and have the right sensitivity, then you don’t ask here. Then you present your house here like Mellina or (you), Alessandro, have done.

Hello everyone,

thank you for the many comments.
Unfortunately, we have only just now gotten around to reading the many contributions.
I will try to address the individual suggestions this evening and present our considerations. If I manage, I will also post a slightly modified version.

See you then!

Hello, here we are again,

The bedroom has useless space on the left side of the plan, which is also separated by a room divider. Why is that so?

We planned to equip the bedroom with a kind of suite with a separate seating area. The room divider is supposed to hold the TV, which should be mounted on a swivel, so you can watch a movie in bed sometimes. We actually had not thought about using it for work. The studio in the attic should serve as the study room.

I would reconsider the window directly above the bathtub.

We did that and changed the layout in the new design.

We actually like the balcony if you want to get some fresh air. With the orientation to the west, you should get enough sun. It is 3m wide and 2m deep. We find the space for 2 chairs and a small table more than sufficient. The balcony at the entrance mainly serves as a roof over the entrance door.

So now I’ll attach the further changes, so keep commenting diligently.

I like the new ground floor plan better, it is more balanced. The kitchen also looks good. But what I don’t understand: Why do you need 4 different seating options on the ground floor? Because of that, the living room unfortunately feels cramped again. I don’t know what kind of environment your house will be in. But I don’t imagine a balcony facing the street to be very nice to sit on. Edit: Wait, that’s not the parents’ balcony at all. You are even planning 2 balconies?

Much better in comparison. For me personally, it still wouldn't be anything.

We actually like the balcony if you want to get some fresh air for a bit.

When would that be, for example? As a house and garden owner, don't you inevitably get enough fresh air every day? I mean: you constantly have to go outside, do something... if I then go upstairs at some point, after my day's work, in the dark, to bathe, sleep, rest... well, you've already had fresh air all day (except sick days), right? And if not, there is still a window to open.