I would have thought by now that something like this is rather standard
Standard is what is good for you.
In any case, a so-called low standard is technically and functionally more than sufficient. Everything above that is usually a matter of taste, established "standards," etc., you can have it but you don’t have to.
I have seen some really beautiful houses here that became really chic with a manageable budget and into which I would move right away; but also quite expensive examples that I would rather just walk past.
If you really want to, you can save a lot of money... but usually you don’t want to that much... o_O
Acquaintances of mine built last year without underfloor heating, without a ventilation system, a "normal shower tray" and tiles for 20€ and I also find the house nice ;-)
Yes, that’s possible!!!
Then you either have wrong settings or a house from 1970.
I feel the same way. We currently have underfloor heating and I would exchange it immediately compared to my former radiator house. I think that there are also individual features with heating that people like more or less, just like elsewhere.
For me, there has to be a fireplace in the house and that is probably difficult with underfloor heating, just like spontaneous heating. What I really do not like is the often-quoted "ventilating," meaning blowing out warm air, because otherwise you overheat; also somewhat strange that I have paid forced heat against which I have to defend myself by opening windows. Underfloor heating also has some nice sides... as always... this and that can fit just as well.