Single-family house – new construction project from day one - and the planning begins

See page 34; post #200 There is only one site plan sketch, as the development plan is currently being prepared by the municipality.

A. So what is your legal framework now? B. Are any nastiness to be expected during the creation process, i.e. do you have to hurry to build before the plan and avoid mandated garden gnome colors?

then I would plan another window. Or you could make a glass door at the WC

We'll think about it

A. what is your legal framework now?
B. are any nastiness to be expected in the construction process, i.e. do you have to hurry to build before the plan and avoid imposed garden gnome colors?

The existing development plan of the original new development area. It was created in 2016 with 18 building plots and was sold out immediately. Directly below, about 10 additional plots are now being developed.

According to the municipality, the new development plan will strongly align with that of the original new development area.

Additionally, in Oct./Nov., the interested parties are to be consulted in order to also (quote municipality) "cover as many building wishes of the interested parties as possible" with the development plan.

We have always coordinated our current planning status (number of floors, size, height, roof shape and pitch) directly with the building authority of the municipality. There were no concerns from their side and we do not expect any unpleasant surprises.

The existing development plan of the original new development area. This was created in 2016 with 18 building plots and was immediately sold out. Directly below, about 10 additional plots are now being developed. According to the municipality, the new development plan will closely follow that of the original new development area.

Usually, things are incorporated that one would have preferred to do differently in the neighboring development plan. But this also depends on how many regulatory gaps were interpreted as undesirable. Conversely, frequently granted exemptions are often incorporated right away. In recent years, there have been many development plans on slopes with unrealistic or only achievable through squaring the circle eaves height regulations – then, in the next plan, e.g., a clear reference height is set for each plot.

Often things flow in immediately that one would have preferred to do differently in the neighboring development plan. But this also depends on how many regulatory gaps were interpreted as undesirable. Conversely, frequently granted exemptions are immediately incorporated. In recent years, there have been many development plans in hillside locations with unrealistic or only by squaring the circle enforceable eaves height regulations - then in the next plan, for example, a clear reference height is set for each plot.

Exactly that was also the problem with the original development plan. It states here:



This then led to the fact that, in principle, no two full-story single-family houses were possible. Subsequently, there was the exceptional regulation that the maximum eaves height may be exceeded by up to 100 cm, provided that the maximum permissible building height is still complied with.

This exceptional regulation is then to be included in the new development plan.

Move the staircase about 60cm to the right according to the plan... and shift your central load-bearing wall, meaning the corners at the entrance and dining area.

Then the children's area on the upper floor becomes too small. The position of the staircase is not really changeable due to the requirements on the upper floor.

Would a 90-degree stair landing be tastefully possible for you?

Taste-wise, of course. I liked it in the model homes. However, it is suboptimal for a future stairlift...

Screw the stairlift. Tear down the stairs later and install a paternoster!