No building land due to new EU native model?

  • Erstellt am 2017-11-11 21:49:46

Alex85

2017-11-13 19:14:44
  • #1


But it can be, and that's exactly why there are local resident models, because well-off city dwellers only want to pay as much for building land as Jutta from Lidl in the village.

Building land is a limited resource and has been for years. With your parameters, you are simply too late. Therefore, it is not necessarily advisable to desperately try to jump on the bandwagon now and possibly overextend yourself or force yourself into a corset that doesn't fit well.

I repeat, where does the urgency come from, where does the urge come from? Because "everyone" is building? Because interest rates are low (you've already disabused yourself of that, right?)?

If it is such an important concern for you, the advice really is to reconsider the "specialization." Do something new; in two years you will be specialists again. I gave up my first specialization because being a specialist also involves risk (besides family and location issues) and I am now more of a generalist and know that if I have to switch, there is a choice here and not just one.
 

Hanneshickel

2017-11-13 19:28:25
  • #2


Thanks, those are a few good tips I will follow up on.
 

77.willo

2017-11-13 20:05:27
  • #3


My job almost only consists of meetings. For the absolute majority, I need support material (counts, results, diagrams) on a screen or printed out. I don’t have that in the car. Another big part is personnel discussions for which I need at least video, since a serious employee discussion is not possible by phone, or does not do justice to the employee.
By phone, I can basically only listen to meetings that are pure information transfer, such as quarterly results, investor calls, etc. The majority of this information can also be sent by PDF mail, and I have therefore abolished them because of time wasting.
There remain a few small bilateral arrangements with my assistant or employees from my own department. For all other calls, you at least have to take notes.
 

ruppsn

2017-11-13 20:15:23
  • #4
Ok, my last post to you here...

Ok, I’m trying to make clear to you why I spoke as an example of myself. It was supposed to refute your claim

Usually, one counterexample is enough to refute such a sweeping statement. I gave you that with ME, it certainly was not primarily about me in particular – I assumed that was clear.


I have read everything from you – and at least about the mentioned post #59 I can only say: unfortunately.

I would also like to justify that, because contrary to what you claim



unfortunately the opposite applies. Well, then I’ll give you a few samples from the post mentioned, which suggests otherwise:



Is it not arrogant, for example, to criticize a personal savings rate derived from individual circumstances? That is applying one’s own standards to judge and condemn those of another person whose circumstances one does not know – that is arrogance.



Ok, no problem, but nevertheless a few lines later you come with an evaluation of his behavior, followed by a claim about the affordability of plots of land – without even having a clue about the local circumstances (in this case in the Munich area, for example prices over 1000 EUR/sqm), with the friendly reference to modesty, which suggests that he is not:



By this point, you really shoot the bird. “People like you,” no arrogance, right?



... or maybe here after all?



Because that definitely comes across as if you were the authority deciding that. Nouveau riche are not necessarily academics, even in Munich. And the income for two people who studied, for example, in the technical field is fairly average – and there are several technology companies in Munich. So please keep things in perspective and take off the envy glasses. Yes, there certainly are many people who have less available, but is it the OP’s fault that those people did not study and get a correspondingly well-paid job? Yes, that may be unfair, but it certainly doesn’t justify blaming the OP for it. And for that reason, he has every right – and it’s not whining at a high level – to view the situation from his perspective. Or should all your whining/complaints about various things always be dismissed with the argument that you are “whining at a high level” because, unfortunately, there are still people who have less than you? One can certainly say that he has a solid, fairly comfortable starting position, ok, but “You belong to the nouveau riche” just comes across as derogatory and arrogant...

And at the latest here, even a neutral observer would find it hard NOT to speak of arrogance – at least that is what I would say:



“...earned more than you...” That’s not arrogance? Well, I don’t know... Apart from the fact that I find it difficult to claim that about someone you don’t know, but how exactly do you define “earned”? By salary? For which he and his wife also each pay the top tax rate? Do you know, for example, whether the OP cares for relatives himself, engages socially in other ways, and thus perhaps contributes more to society than couple X-Y-Z, who received a plot through a local’s scheme and otherwise don’t give a damn about their fellow human beings?

You just nurture your “enemy images,” right? Average salary in the profession, inconveniently even higher than your own -> not possible, that cannot be “earned.” Cross-industry payment injustices are not the OP’s fault...

And finally, then this:



Nope, I won’t let you silence me because you are not in a position to do so....
 

readytorumble

2017-11-13 20:15:59
  • #5

Yes, you’re a real hotshot. That’s what you wanted to say, right?
 

ypg

2017-11-13 21:20:38
  • #6
If my post comes across as strange and also presumptuous to you, I can understand that. However, I quoted the OP and consciously used his words in my post.





I have no personal standard for savings rates at all. With my sentence I only summed up what previous posters generally criticized.





Yep! It’s all based on what the OP wrote. Here, I have highlighted what my words are based on. It is not my style or language use to speak of newly rich people. Therefore, I stand by my opinion that the OP sees himself as a victim, he speaks of punishment and sees himself treated unfairly, although he is obviously in a situation that allows him to get a plot without subsidies like this “locals’ model.”



And yes: I am of the opinion that the OP Hannes misjudges himself and his situation.

How to find plots on the free market I can only answer regionally. Apparently, the clocks tick differently in and around Munich than in the North—here there are always some for sale… if necessary, leasehold will do as well.
 

Similar topics
17.04.2016Value of land and bungalow B5511
08.11.2010Offer for a semi-detached house with land, okay?11
07.07.2011Financing land now, house in 6 months?17
14.08.2012Build a home? Land in prospect19
25.03.2012Land now - house construction next year23
31.05.2012Financing of the property: Does the entire financing need to be secured?11
04.09.2012Land paid - Building with an additional loan?16
02.09.2013Angular bungalow on 800m² plot - financially feasible?16
09.02.2013What do you think of this property?11
28.05.2013I am getting a plot of land as a gift. How do I finance the construction?16
03.06.2013Buying land from father - building a house yes or no?11
01.08.2013Is the property right for us?15
22.08.2013Buying land for a house, please advise!46
22.08.2013Plot - Decision?14
25.08.2014Buy land now and build in 2 years13
31.03.2015Property / Financing amount / Insurance? Experiences10
19.11.2015Land is in sight - Financing feasible?11
11.10.2019Indigenous model - is this still legal?152
05.09.2020What can we afford / finance? House / land13
05.04.2022Feasibility financing new construction (land + semi-detached house or semi-detached half)93

Oben