Maria16
2017-11-14 11:30:54
- #1
As far as I can tell, politics and municipalities are indeed making an effort to create housing. But there is more to it than just a few new streets and a bit of land sealing.
I was once told by a municipality that they conduct a needs survey for daycare centers and the like – but then gain a third of the children through in-migration in the meantime. Crazy.
It also seems crazy when in a municipality of 5,000 inhabitants, which consists of a total of about a dozen district parts (correspondingly small numbers in the individual districts), new development areas for several hundred people are to be created. Clearly, such municipalities want to grow more slowly so that the village structure even has a chance to keep up.
back to the actual topic:
in the new development areas with the local residents model, there is usually a building obligation as far as I know. If a builder does not start on time, there is usually a repurchase right of the municipality to prevent land speculation. Whether it makes sense to exhaust building gaps in local residents models is therefore questionable.
I was once told by a municipality that they conduct a needs survey for daycare centers and the like – but then gain a third of the children through in-migration in the meantime. Crazy.
It also seems crazy when in a municipality of 5,000 inhabitants, which consists of a total of about a dozen district parts (correspondingly small numbers in the individual districts), new development areas for several hundred people are to be created. Clearly, such municipalities want to grow more slowly so that the village structure even has a chance to keep up.
back to the actual topic:
in the new development areas with the local residents model, there is usually a building obligation as far as I know. If a builder does not start on time, there is usually a repurchase right of the municipality to prevent land speculation. Whether it makes sense to exhaust building gaps in local residents models is therefore questionable.