11ant
2022-09-06 19:30:01
- #1
I got hold of a different floor plan of our house, with furniture and new views.
Perhaps you should loudly recap for us which thoughts from the design in led to the planning status shown here in post #65.
But by far not everything about the floor plan is bad.
However, there is still no "right in the wrong." If a design is no good in the end result, you have to redo it N-E-W!
That means you go back in the conceptual discussion and rebuild it from there (that’s how the architect does it without quotation marks, because only that is goal-oriented). If, instead, you cut out "all parts that were not entirely botched" out of pure respect for their innocence (or whatever) from being thrown away and incorporate them into the (then just not really) "new" design (but obviously without being able to miraculously increase money, outer dimensions, or anything similar by now), then unfortunately that is misleading – and the result is inevitably a hopeless, desperate muddle (that’s how the "architect" aka draft servant does it). Therefore, even the parts that were not entirely botched must be radically and rigorously revised!
You love your parents way too much to feed them something like that. At least I wouldn’t do it.
I already hinted that the OP will wish for a hole to sink into the ground upon realizing the real dimensions in the shell construction. Neatly plotted, it doesn’t look so criminal at all, but in reality
and do they know they have to eat at the TV table?
(I couldn’t have put it better) the extent of regret will no longer be alleviated that the dice have been cast (too cramped). Maybe before crossing the Rubicon, one should still go to "full-scale floor plan" :) – that would certainly be my recommendation. WITH THE RESIDENTS OF the granny flat, mind you.