By the way, your problem is not new, see here at @Claudia-W: – and also Yvonne's proposal.
I don't need to compare the designs in detail to know that the former is our current MarlenP.
I find some statements misleading:
We are currently in the final planning phase
As I said, we have already received the building permit.
Regarding the parking spaces:
2 parking spaces will probably not be enough. But we can park additional cars at the house in the north.
That doesn’t sound good :-(. Regarding the garage – only one car will be parked here. The remaining space will be used for bicycles, gardening tools, etc.
The architect did not draw these in because the building authority might object to them.
In the north, I only see an emergency spot... of course, the architect did not mark this because it will officially not be allowed.
2nd residential unit (both over 60)
We thought that two seniors who are almost 70 wouldn’t need much more space.
Over 60 means, precisely 60, one or two years beyond. Almost 70 means 69 years... At this age, much physical decline happens, so one has to say that over-60 activities, also at home, are different from almost 70.
My parents will mostly stay on the ground floor. The stairs and the room upstairs in the granny flat are planned as a guest room because my parents often have visitors.
My parents need quite a bit of space since they regularly receive visits from their children and angel children (they live near the new development area).
My parents’ youngest son (that is my brother :)) studies somewhat farther away from the parents and often comes home and sometimes stays for days or weeks.
Then again this contradicts itself:
We thought that two seniors who are almost 70 wouldn’t need much more space.
My parents need quite a bit of space since they regularly receive visits from their children and angel children (they live near the new development area).
What do the seniors say about this whole plan? Are they not even asked if they are satisfied with the space?
For example, I see more of a 3-meter kitchen with a small dining table rather than a kitchenette, which wouldn’t even be sufficient on vacation.
Regarding the criticism of our floor plan. To be honest, I am very disappointed that despite months of planning with our architect, we apparently did not get the optimum out of it.
Maybe you should look for the fault within yourselves? The beginnings of a floor plan discussion were there at the beginning of the year. And then came
We are reasonably satisfied that we have more than one option for later.
If you only plan for options or later, most people here drop out of the discussion. But you also did not continue it further. However, I found the approach from January better than now...
Mostly the floor plan of the granny flat was criticized, but how is the floor plan of the main apartment to be judged?
No, for example, I wrote among other things that you should try to furnish it with real furniture. I find no planning at all in the ground floor part of your house section so that it was left at a loveless rough semi-detached sketch solution. For me, that is just something like a sketch, but nothing worked out or fair for a family of five. The approach from January was better.
So that he can have his peace, and the parents in front of him, we planned the room upstairs with a shower bathroom.
There is practically an ageless studying youngest child, which does not fit at all with a senior-friendly apartment. The question for me would be where he will basically live. It reads as if he is still registered at his parents’ and not just visiting.
How old is he? 23 or 32? So can one say that three people will move into the senior apartment, one of whom is occasionally away studying?
The bathroom is sufficiently large for us. We currently also have a bathtub in the bathroom, which the children and we have not used for years. That is why we left it out.
Size is not defined by a bathtub. What, of course, was not mentioned is the location of the bathroom above the intended living room...
The 2 people have 2 of those and you 5 only one?
That already shows the inadequacy: a guest/son gets his own bathroom, while 5 people squeeze around nearly the same size.
Topic compact: You have to stay compact anyway, as the plot does not allow much. If you use the garage mainly with the children and also expect noise and activities there from lawnmowers, children’s fleet, daily commuting by car, friends visiting, etc., then I’m aiming now to the idea that the granny flat for the seniors should lie rather on the play street. Playing children usually release happiness hormones in older people rather than rattling metal and grumpy or quarrelsome morning grouches. You could spread out to the east and south then. In between could be the utility room with guest section (student plus shower WC), which later the now 17-year-old could get, or possibly other visitors (grandchild was also mentioned somewhere).
But maybe I am completely wrong with the idea of switching the layout of the two residential units.
With the floor area ratio, you are already tied now. That means: significantly larger is not possible.