K a t j a
2023-04-15 11:53:58
- #1
I have to admit that I find it somewhat incomprehensible that you position these strong slopes so deep without it being necessary. Hence the question about the heights. That in turn affects the square meters and so you probably end up with different sqm numbers. So let’s wait and see what actually comes out in the end. Many try to promote the idea of doing work themselves here. Experience shows that very few actually manage it. I would also advise you not to plan too much for that and especially not to count on regular help from friends or relatives.Budget: So I see more around 140m² rather than 160m² for the two upper floors. In addition, we are located in a very rural area where people still know and help each other well. We have acquaintances in most trades where we sometimes only pay for the materials and will do a lot of work ourselves. We hope to manage with 500k, but are currently waiting for the exact costs from the architect. If necessary, we might have to increase the budget a bit, which is doable.
That could still get interesting. If the community just approves it as currently envisaged, okay. But if not (which is usually to be expected), it will set off a chain of consequences that should not be underestimated.Distance rules: As far as I know from the architect, the neighboring municipality only needs to be approved by the community. After first inquiry, there is no fixed rule and we only have to stay "somewhat" away from the street. The architect wanted to plan it that way and clarify it finally.
Ah, well that’s something.Reference point height: After the architect’s inquiry with the municipality, the definition is actually not clear. In agreement with the municipality, we plan to use the average value of the four corner points of the house as the reference point.
Mmh, why is that? That wouldn’t be my first choice due to water and because you hardly find a company that usually builds with it.Planned is to build with pumice stone.