Floor plan discussion based on existing thread

The section shows that the basement now hardly offers a good exit. There is quite a bit to be removed.

The cross-section shows that the basement now hardly offers a good exit. Quite a bit will have to be removed there.

We would be at 497m there, thus ensuring a nice exit to the garden. It will be excavated that far as well. Works, doesn't it?

the submission of the building application has unfortunately been delayed a bit. [...] According to the architect's calculation, the house averages 0.90m above the original terrain, resulting in a height of 7.99m above the ursprünglichen Gelände, which exhausts the maximum ridge height of 8m.

For the (reason why delayed?) building application, it is probably more relevant how high the house is above the Bezugspunkt.

What exactly are we supposed to check here again: I cannot see any interim changes, and without changed facts I see no basis for a renewed assessment (?)

For the (why postponed?) building application, it is probably more relevant how high the house is above the reference point.

What exactly are we supposed to check here again: I can’t see any interim changes, and without changed facts I see no basis for a new assessment (?)

Hello 11ant,
the building application has not yet been submitted due to illness and vacation, but is now fully prepared. I meant 0.90m above the reference point (average of the original heights of the 4 corners of the house).
So far, no sectional drawing with the heights has been provided here, so these could not be assessed yet. Hence the question whether anything stands out about the section.

Best regards

Is the municipality satisfied with the heights of the contour lines? Or would the corner points of the house need to be surveyed by a surveyor?

Hello Hanghaus, The architect was in contact with the municipality. I think by the end of next week we will know if everything is okay as it is. Best regards