Floor plan discussion based on existing thread

Good morning,

attached is the current status again. The following points are still on the agenda for further clarification before moving on to the further details:
- chimney through ridge
- door size bathroom
- exact wall arrangement upper floor
- slope design southeast
- roof overhang (here we would like to hear opinions again, visually it almost appears somewhat too generous)

best regards

attached again is the current status.

Should these be spot-the-difference images, or just the same ones again?

The following points are still on the agenda for further clarification before going into more details:
- Fireplace through ridge [...]
- Roof overhang (feel free to give opinions again here, visually it almost seems a bit too generous)

Is this now finest irony, or denial of facts, to call a glaring planning error a "detail"?
What is the alpine roof overhang justified by?

Should these be seek-and-find pictures, or just the same ones again?

Hello 11ant,
no, of course not. I just wanted to clearly present the current status again so that you don't have to jump through all the posts. The room sizes are also included.

Is this now finest irony, or denial of facts, to call a blatant planning error a "detail"?
What is the alpine roof overhang justified by?

maybe a bit poorly phrased, clarifying the listed points/planning errors BEFORE getting into the details.
There is no justification yet for the roof overhang, that's why I want to clarify it. I find the overhang towards the Southeast and Northwest okay; towards the Northeast and Southwest it can certainly be a bit smaller, I think?!

many greetings

Just wanted to clearly summarize the current status again so that you don’t have to jump through all the posts. The room sizes are also included.

But no door sizes, even though you specifically ask for them. The drawings would have sufficed as a source reference (see "post no. XY", or linked) – then no one would be looking for incorporated corrections.

clarifying the listed points/planning errors BEFORE going into details. There is still no justification for the roof overhang, that’s why I want to clarify it. I find the overhang towards Southeast and Northwest okay; towards Northeast and Southwest it can certainly be somewhat smaller, I think?!

I still don’t see anything here that could go into details. Even at design scale, the drawings are qualitatively still preliminary drafts. And a roof overhang, insofar as it may not be symmetrical, is not a detail but an essential (to be clarified in service phase 1!!!). If I infer cost reliability from such planning deficiencies, it really makes me want to arm with a whip in advance, if you know what I mean ...

But no door sizes, although you specifically asked for them. The drawings would have sufficed to be given as a source reference (see "post no. XY," or linked) – then no one searches for incorporated corrections.

Ok, sorry. I promise to improve.

I still don’t see ANYTHING able to go into detail here. Even at the design scale, the drawings are qualitatively still preliminary drafts. And a roof overhang, insofar as it may not be symmetrical, is not a detail but an essential (to be clarified in service phase 1!!!). If I conclude cost accuracy from such planning defects, it makes me very tempted to arm @Gerddieter precautiously with a whip, if you understand...

As I said, the roof overhang is now next on the agenda to clarify. Regarding cost accuracy, I can only rely on the experiences of acquaintances; in no case were there increased costs compared to the planning.

Regarding cost adherence, I can only refer to the experiences of acquaintances; in no case were there increased costs compared to the plan.

You already said that – and I hope my amazement about it will still last when you do the final tally after completion.