Floor plan 175 sqm gable roof without basement

Do you already see that the current floor plan violates the development plan?

Tell me the post number of the latest version, then I’ll gladly give my two cents. As you can see from my quotes, you definitely don’t have to do full quote citations here. In the meantime, I have taken a close look at the development plan and its explanatory document and can provide partial reassurance – in a complete plan, things are more understandable and often less dramatic than in the thumbnails, which unfortunately many questioners post here cropped closely around their property boundaries. My initial suspicion of areas serving easements for utilities has not been confirmed. The light brown areas beyond the blue lines are supposed to have a somewhat vaguely described garden belt character, so your pool might still have a chance – but don’t confuse procedural freedom with a carte blanche. The special areas Ga/Cp of your left neighbor have turned out, in a large-scale view and reading of the plan documents, to be areas intended for the purpose that your neighbor is allowed to create parking spaces, also covered or enclosed, between the building envelopes for his house and a semi-detached house in his rear property section. So they do not very likely mean that he wants to stick a garage right up to your fence. Regarding Katja’s question about the dormer, the explanatory document is ambiguous on page 46 under 6.1.3: setbacks and projections up to 1.5 m deep over a maximum of one third of the house side length are permitted, again with the explicit exception of the building line on Nibelungenstrasse. With legally enforceable poor performance by your architect, you will probably need stamina for two or three instances (and a competent expert) even though I don’t think much of him aside from the setbacks. As far as I have read all the further intermediate posts up to here, your only option remains to act more dominantly in the future – so practice in front of the mirror that you are not a subject but a client.

I continue to doubt that this is the result of an architect. Such gross blunders do not happen to someone even with willful ignorance after 4 years of study.

Many thanks for the comments. I’ll take this with me and we’ll discuss again whether to make the house a bit narrower and where the two parking spaces will go. Also a window in the kitchen so it’s not a "black hole." So again, THANK YOU!

I also take with me: - To file a complaint against the architect who is actually not an architect. Because this floor plan could never have been created by an architect. As an accusation: garage planned incorrectly and the children's room is a storage room with almost 14 sqm. Wow... you notice that yourself, right?

- I need to practice being more dominant? Where on earth do you read from this how my demeanor is? So please, just leave out such things, they have nothing to do with this topic or anything else.

I am glad that I am confident, that many of these sentences here don’t bother me, whether regarding my demeanor or the floor plan. But do I get upset about how someone can even write something like this? Yes, unfortunately! But yes, this is an anonymous space here and some use it. Please just learn a bit.

But still, I can take some things from here, and for that, thank you!

I have not read everything now, but 10 m width is already possible.



Where can one find the current floor plans?

In the first contribution. The length below is slightly more than 17 meters

In the first post. The length at the bottom is slightly more than 17 meters

I would have thought it is 16.92m Have you not yet taken all the remarks into account and incorporated them into the planning? With street-oriented alignment, you show your face with the front view. That is not exactly a masterpiece of the architect.