Floor plan 175 sqm gable roof without basement

Your draft so far 10.09 wide x 10.67 deep
according to Saralina's draft 7.5 wide x 13.5 deep (this way, when revised, both the guest area and living/dining/cooking can be somewhat more spacious than with Saralina. You also want a bathroom with a shower, etc., on the ground floor.

Your draft so far 10.09 wide x 10.67 deep
according to Saralina’s draft 7.5 wide x 13.5 deep (with this, upon revision, both the guest area and the living/dining/cooking area can become somewhat more spacious than with Saralina. You also want a bathroom with shower etc. on the ground floor.

That’s correct. The house would only be somewhat smaller than the original floor plan. And an office would still need to be integrated upstairs.
I need to think about that. Thanks
No idea if our architect will be of any help with that

That is why I already suggested over a meter longer than saralina's solution. Possibly even 14 m long. That roughly matches the total floor area of your previous planning.

That's why I already suggested over a meter longer than saralinas' solution. Possibly even 14 m long. That roughly matches the total floor area of your previous planning.

I need to have it drawn. What "bothers" us a bit about your suggestion is that on the right side there is wasted space with the 3 meters. I can put windows on the side, but then there shouldn't be a carport or anything similar there. Since we can't put a garage on the right side anyway, the idea would be to leave the floor plan as originally planned and put the garage on the left side, after the entrance. That way, we might lose the window on the right side of the living room, but we could put one in the kitchen. And we would have used all the space in the front and lose less of the garden. It’s unfortunate that the house has to be built on the street side, we all agree on that. That's why the large garden is all the more important to me. I hope you understand what I mean.

I have now gathered from the messages that the current floor plan is absolutely not acceptable. We will definitely clarify whether there is still enough space on the side for the entrance and parking space (although the architect assured us it should work, but well, the architect...). Therefore the question: is the current floor plan really rubbish? And do we have to start completely over with a new architect?

Well, you are quite a character. You come in post #45 quite casually as a cheerfully whistling Hans Guckindieluft with a big bombshell of information: that your property is enclosed by knot lines and alone forms the planning area MI3, above the plan for two properties probably a WA1 (and behind that at any rate a WA2) borders it, the back ten meters of your property lie outside the building boundary (so much for your dream of a pool), and on the neighbor to the left of the plan there is even a special building window Ga/Cp right up to your boundary. Then you can still see on your left side and on the neighbor 315/2 at the top of the plan a three-meter wide angle – the only thing missing is that there is a GFL right on it. When Katja says that hardly any consideration has been given here to the development plan, that is still phrased very politely up to the breaking point!

No, you can’t "still evaluate whether the windows make sense". How an architect can arbitrarily rotate a house and change the stairs is beyond me and seems like a perfect excuse to terminate his contract. Where did you even find him?

Daher die Frage: ist der aktuelle Grundriss wirklich Schrott? und wir müssen komplett neu starten mit einem neuen Architekten?

Besides the fact that after so many essential pieces of information dropped so extremely late I really have no desire to analytically deal with the floor plan: the architect is absolutely without question replaceable, and with a proper architect you should always start anew, that is, without dragging the "virus carrier old plan" into the work with him. At most, the draft from can – but only after his first preliminary draft! – be brought into the discussion with him. I don’t have an architect "on stock" yet in the HP circle, but I’m happy to look for one for you.