The first remark I find extremely exciting and I fully support it.
That fits perfectly with this topic. Who are the wrong-way drivers?
And I do not assume everyone does not understand it (that would be presumptuous and not my style).
You just have to be open to it and not always, always refer only to the annual performance factor of the heat pump and its low consumption.
And now again your hint that one could also supply a heat pump with photovoltaic.
Of course, that is certainly the technically more efficient, but precisely not economical.
Please refer to my remarks from previous answers for that.
I wonder, why is there never a comprehensible counter-calculation here?
Arguments yes - but then please back them up with numbers, data and facts.
Do a holistic consideration - but again, nothing comes of it.
What would be the point if I compare one direct electric heating with the other type, when it is always only the heat pump being put forward here. But if you want - gladly:
- I think nothing of night storage heaters -> no longer up to date, no comfort but strangely still allowed.
- Electric underfloor heating -> also okay, but possibly more losses than with our system
- Air-to-air heat pump -> not bad, but too much stirring up – air is a worse heat carrier
- Fan heater -> extremely cheap (I have mentioned that before) but also no good comfort due to convection
- Other infrared heaters -> also gladly, but they are usually too hot and therefore in a worse comfort class
I end again with the call: Make a counter-calculation here publicly with comprehensible data!!!
Why is there never anything substantial? As an incentive, I give you an annual performance factor of 10 for the heat pump free of charge.
But please make it comparable anyway – so the same investment costs with an overall consideration of the energy demands in the house!
So – now come with your full cost calculations.