a storage system comes into play and static earnings values are calculated
Both help your variant, as I explained above. So very fairly calculated by
Suddenly continuous text and no more tables.
That should suit you, right?
The one with the tables was .
The discussion leads to no end - so I am ending it from my side now
A pity, I would have liked to know what you think about my thesis regarding the target group.
Why do you add 600 kWh of feed-in tariff on top, which you previously claimed as self-consumption for electricity demand? A kilowatt hour produced by photovoltaics cannot be both self-used and sold at the same time, can it!? Apart from that: shouldn’t the feed-in tariff be subtracted instead of added (because income, not expenses)? I am currently confused.
Read your own text slowly once more. You answered your question yourself. He adds the (lost) feed-in tariff to the costs. Economically exactly correct, as this is not a cash flow consideration.
The calculation is unfortunately completely wrong just for the reason that he completely leaves out the total earnings from photovoltaics in Vx + photovoltaics and only takes the yield that can be used directly for heating in winter. Everything else generated by photovoltaics - simply omitted
No, not omitted. He precisely states what he does with it, namely to pay for the photovoltaics in both variants.