Most of the time, everyone here complains that the architects estimate too low a construction sum. Now it is the other way around.
About the estimated price:
I would now verify the estimated price based on conversations. Once with regional craftsmen, once with a general contractor. From the conversations, you get a feeling for the architect’s assessment and information about what might be the cost drivers. Afterwards, you can decide how to proceed - e.g. obtaining concrete offers.
About paying the architect:
Of course, the architect must be paid for his work - however, he cannot simply work outside the scope of the contract. Therefore, it is important what role, for example, a budget limit played in the contract. A "missed issue" cannot cost the full price.
About the wish for house size and equipment:
It is completely legitimate to have ideas and want to realize them. The house is large and is based on a cost-intensive energy standard. If the house deviates too much from the idea due to the budget, "letting go" might be a good option.
At the beginning of the planning, we oriented ourselves towards a desired optimum - knowing we would suffer a price shock. That did happen. Since we were able to identify the cost drivers, we found alternatives for these that came closest to our optimal idea and that we could be sure would not bother us daily. We found this out by comparing our wishes with the actual contribution to quality of life. Not everything you want is also needed for your life satisfaction.
About discussions in the family:
Depending on the family structure, it sometimes makes sense to lovingly put one or the other person with a tendency toward overbearing behavior in their place. I hope for you that the constellation is not such that "everyone" has something to say about your building project.