Coffee82
2021-11-23 18:39:07
- #1
We were too naive. We still are. Back then, we received a great tip to build with an architect. The advantages were obvious. You could design your house yourself and be flexible. The architect takes the entire work off our hands. The architect already knows many companies and can negotiate prices well. The architect... The architect.... The architect is the best man, and in the end it only costs maybe 20-30 thousand euros more because he negotiates prices well. On the internet, it says that building with an architect is often more expensive. But often is not always, and certainly not twice as much. It was a mistake, that is clear today. The contract as I know it was not concluded. We only talked about it, he sketched a little with his pencil on a few appointments and thus an oral contract was unnoticedly concluded. But we do not want to speak badly of him. No blame either. We would have only wished that he had pointed out the costs to us. And that earlier than LS 1 and 2 were completed. Such oral contracts are common. And he also did everything quickly. Going back is bad, the architect must get the money. Building is not possible at that price.May I ask why you want to build an architect-designed house if it is supposed to be a "simple house like at uncle’s"?