Floor plan of an accessible bungalow

  • Erstellt am 2017-09-26 14:33:05

winnetou78

2017-09-28 10:39:35
  • #1


Don't they do that to you too, even though the highest amounts are always assumed?
 

ypg

2017-09-28 11:22:56
  • #2


What do you mean?
No, I don’t compare our general contractor’s budget house with an architect’s house.
I don’t compare our price for gravel for the yard with a paved driveway.
And I don’t compare my demands, whether less pronounced in one area (e.g. heating technology) or higher in special design, with the demands of others.
And I certainly don’t have to equate the needs of a two-person household with those of a four-person household.

I always try to empathize a bit with the original poster and their wishes.

If someone here with two left hands asks about construction prices, I can’t tell them they can save several thousand euros with a trip to the hardware store.

Basically, I prefer to help those who are building with a general contractor and despair over the floor plan because they can’t afford an architect. I try to help those people and have already questioned many expensive nice-to-haves in my numerous thread starts so that an affordable house results for people with normal incomes.

Definitely, hardly the highest costs are called up here, but you don’t have to approve everything with cheap construction either—you also have to open your eyes sometimes.
For example, if you tell yourself that landscaping can be done yourself, good night, Marie, if you suggest that to the original poster. Because building a ramp for a wheelchair doesn’t cost nothing either.

And in central and southern Germany, the soil conditions are simply different than in the flat country. The north-south divide is already visible in incomes...

No more time, otherwise I could write novels.
Best to also flip to page 30 of the forum and read.
 

11ant

2017-09-28 13:47:02
  • #3
Even if that were the usable dimension, it would only be sufficient for an unaccompanied solo driver; and even then, traveling forward in would have to be followed by traveling backward out.

So what now: should the house be low or not? 35° is okay, but 40° for a bungalow is already borderline monstrously tall in proportion. And without expansion, just for show, pure waste. For that money, you could have a few more square meters downstairs (i.e., for example, twice as much space between the kitchen rows).
 

Evolith

2017-09-28 13:58:04
  • #4
Just for orientation. We have 42 degrees. You can see how high that looks. Everyone thinks we have a one and a half story
 

Nordlys

2017-09-28 14:05:40
  • #5
35 degrees looks like this. The attic then looks like this.
 

ypg

2017-09-28 14:41:15
  • #6


You could convert it into a bunch of children's rooms for the planned large family
 
Oben