Pinkiponk
2020-10-14 18:29:27
- #1
As announced some time ago, our old house in Baden-Württemberg has now been sold, our move to the Leipzig district completed, and we can now focus concretely on our new house. Due to our age, we have consciously downsized in terms of plot size and living space. An initial architectural plan is available. I have already noted a few change requests and am now looking forward to your additions, criticism, and suggestions. If further plans or similar are needed, I will gladly provide them as far as they are available to me.
Thank you in advance for taking the time to help me.
Development plan/restrictions
Plot size: 567 sqm
Slope: visually imperceptible; if this is important information, I will look for where I can find it
Site coverage index: 0.35
Floor space index: 0.8
Building window, building line and boundary: see attached drawing
Edge development: not allowed / not desired on our part
Number of parking spaces: 2
Number of floors: 2
Roof type: hipped roof
Style: classic, conservative
Orientation: ?
Maximum heights/limits: "Difference top of finished ground floor slab to ridge height main roof max. 11.5 meters"; "Difference top of finished ground floor slab to eaves height main roof max. 7.0 meters"
Further requirements
Client requirements
Style, roof shape, building type: we are trying to approach the house shown in the photo below; however, without gable overhang; classic/conservative, hipped roof, townhouse
Basement, stories: no basement, 2 stories
Number of persons, age: 1x male 64 years - 1x female 58 years
Room requirements on ground floor (GF), upper floor (UF): GF --> kitchen, shower bathroom, common/living room, utility room with kitchenette and floor drain, hallway; UF --> bathroom with bathtub, bedroom, 2 x "clothes and junk rooms"
Office: family use or home office? Couple without children, no home office
Guests sleeping per year: 10
Open or closed architecture: open outside, closed inside
Conservative or modern construction: conservative
Open kitchen, cooking island: no, classic L-shaped kitchen or similar (the plan shows a cooking island that will not exist)
Number of dining places: in kitchen 2, in common/living room up to 6-8
Fireplace: gas stove chimney
Music/stereo wall: no
Balcony, roof terrace: both no
Garage, carport: 2 x arched carports
Utility garden, greenhouse: both no
Further wishes/special features/daily routine, preferably also reasons why this or that should not be
House design
Who created the plan:
- Builder company planner: yes, in combination with the builder
- Architect: unclear
- Do-it-yourself: yes, in combination with planner of the prefab house manufacturer
What do you particularly like? Why? Many windows and patio doors, lots of daylight and air
What do you dislike? Why? In the plan, the windows on the upper floor are too low, but this will be changed
Price estimate according to architect/planner: already commissioned offer/order 312,780.00 euros (without carport, outdoor facilities, ancillary building costs, land, ...)
Personal price limit for the house, incl. equipment: 400,000.00 euros
Preferred heating technology: gas condensing boiler plus solar thermal (according to legal requirements)
If you have to give up, which details/extensions
- can you give up: we already give up shutters, whirlpool
- can you not give up: many windows and patio doors, muntins in the windows and doors
Why has the design turned out as it is now? e.g.
A mix of many examples from various magazines...
What makes it particularly good or bad in your eyes? It corresponds largely to our wishes. We want to be able to step into the garden from every room on the ground floor. We find symmetry more pleasing than asymmetry. Few different window and door formats. No "horizontal" windows. Each of us has our own room for, among other things, clothing, so that we do not have to place a wardrobe in the bedroom. We do not want a separate dressing room.
What is the most important/fundamental question about the floor plan summarized in 130 characters?
The roof seems somewhat steep to me. Is 30 degrees roof pitch too steep for a house with a base of 9.40 sqm x 9.40 sqm? The standard according to the provider for this house is 22 degrees. That seemed too flat to me, or you can hardly see the roof.
The development plan was too large to upload; I will try again in a separate post in this thread.







Thank you in advance for taking the time to help me.
Development plan/restrictions
Plot size: 567 sqm
Slope: visually imperceptible; if this is important information, I will look for where I can find it
Site coverage index: 0.35
Floor space index: 0.8
Building window, building line and boundary: see attached drawing
Edge development: not allowed / not desired on our part
Number of parking spaces: 2
Number of floors: 2
Roof type: hipped roof
Style: classic, conservative
Orientation: ?
Maximum heights/limits: "Difference top of finished ground floor slab to ridge height main roof max. 11.5 meters"; "Difference top of finished ground floor slab to eaves height main roof max. 7.0 meters"
Further requirements
Client requirements
Style, roof shape, building type: we are trying to approach the house shown in the photo below; however, without gable overhang; classic/conservative, hipped roof, townhouse
Basement, stories: no basement, 2 stories
Number of persons, age: 1x male 64 years - 1x female 58 years
Room requirements on ground floor (GF), upper floor (UF): GF --> kitchen, shower bathroom, common/living room, utility room with kitchenette and floor drain, hallway; UF --> bathroom with bathtub, bedroom, 2 x "clothes and junk rooms"
Office: family use or home office? Couple without children, no home office
Guests sleeping per year: 10
Open or closed architecture: open outside, closed inside
Conservative or modern construction: conservative
Open kitchen, cooking island: no, classic L-shaped kitchen or similar (the plan shows a cooking island that will not exist)
Number of dining places: in kitchen 2, in common/living room up to 6-8
Fireplace: gas stove chimney
Music/stereo wall: no
Balcony, roof terrace: both no
Garage, carport: 2 x arched carports
Utility garden, greenhouse: both no
Further wishes/special features/daily routine, preferably also reasons why this or that should not be
House design
Who created the plan:
- Builder company planner: yes, in combination with the builder
- Architect: unclear
- Do-it-yourself: yes, in combination with planner of the prefab house manufacturer
What do you particularly like? Why? Many windows and patio doors, lots of daylight and air
What do you dislike? Why? In the plan, the windows on the upper floor are too low, but this will be changed
Price estimate according to architect/planner: already commissioned offer/order 312,780.00 euros (without carport, outdoor facilities, ancillary building costs, land, ...)
Personal price limit for the house, incl. equipment: 400,000.00 euros
Preferred heating technology: gas condensing boiler plus solar thermal (according to legal requirements)
If you have to give up, which details/extensions
- can you give up: we already give up shutters, whirlpool
- can you not give up: many windows and patio doors, muntins in the windows and doors
Why has the design turned out as it is now? e.g.
A mix of many examples from various magazines...
What makes it particularly good or bad in your eyes? It corresponds largely to our wishes. We want to be able to step into the garden from every room on the ground floor. We find symmetry more pleasing than asymmetry. Few different window and door formats. No "horizontal" windows. Each of us has our own room for, among other things, clothing, so that we do not have to place a wardrobe in the bedroom. We do not want a separate dressing room.
What is the most important/fundamental question about the floor plan summarized in 130 characters?
The roof seems somewhat steep to me. Is 30 degrees roof pitch too steep for a house with a base of 9.40 sqm x 9.40 sqm? The standard according to the provider for this house is 22 degrees. That seemed too flat to me, or you can hardly see the roof.
The development plan was too large to upload; I will try again in a separate post in this thread.