10x10m city villa (approx. 155m², 6 rooms), fine-tuning desired

  • Erstellt am 2017-08-20 14:34:30

Curly

2017-08-21 08:33:29
  • #1


why are your rooms so low? Aren't you allowed to build higher? 2.40m doesn't look so bad in small rooms, but in your large living room including kitchen it will feel very oppressive.

Best regards
Sabine
 

chand1986

2017-08-21 08:36:05
  • #2
I would fully agree with #18 from Michael.

The house in this plan will not be livable and will create problems that you actually want to avoid when building a house (for example, that the utility room is too small and forces some appliance to be stored elsewhere was also my first thought).

The staircase is currently a bottleneck. You can only get furniture into the upper floor in parts, and relatively small ones at that. But a better staircase would cost additional space—which is already scarce.

It seems that the planner could only reconcile your wishes and your limits at a high price. Of course he could, he wants to sell you something.

Frankly: You want too much in too little space. Just modifying the floor plan a bit won’t solve the problem. Basically, it needs to be clarified whether you can create more space (maybe cut something off the megalomaniac carport?) or if you can do without a room.

What you currently see as indispensable can only be reconciled with the current space offer through poor solutions. Who wants a house that is a string of bad solutions? You usually build for the good ones...
 

ypg

2017-08-21 08:54:41
  • #3
Well, I don't see that a child needs a 160 cm bed at the age of 12 (or older). But the more I compare the design with the location, the more it becomes clear that it is not the house, but the outbuilding that is planned generously. The bend in the hallway takes away much of this feeling, darkness does the rest. You don't need a third children's room if you are planning for 1-2 children. The term generosity includes a staircase that is comfortable to walk on daily. You don't have the narrow and bent hallway if you place the door to the south. The driveway is probably on the west side, so it makes sense to drive directly into the carports. Then you also have a house entrance nearby and can place the living rooms in the west. You should consider whether you want to give the house such a dominant outbuilding that looks like a gas station from a bird's-eye view. Probably something like that won't be approved because it does not subordinate to the house.
 

Changeling

2017-08-21 09:42:24
  • #4

Yes, that’s not a problem. Because:


The property is about 2m higher than the streets to the north and west, so a road is being built to the south for this and the properties to the east, running west to east (along the large building). Due to the height difference, there is no other way. But it’s all already planned and approved.


No, see the orientation on the property (the map is oriented north).



I really can’t judge that. Higher rooms cost more money, although “only a few thousand euros.” We are very satisfied with the current 2.40 m room height in our current house, but the largest room there is only 4.7 x 6.5 m.
My parents’ house was an old farmhouse where the ceilings were significantly lower.



Our stairs currently measure 2.30 x 1.50 (!!) m in the same design. It was a bit tight during the move but everything basically fitted. Even now, no one has a problem with it here. So I literally don’t see it as “too tight”…


The way you say it sounds somehow strange, but yes, that’s actually how we do it currently. Our hallway is always nice and clean because of that.


How would you solve it otherwise? We actually don’t find it bad (otherwise we wouldn’t have planned it that way).


As I said, if it doesn’t work out contrary to expectations (currently it works well), there is still the guest/work room.


As I said, the only thing bothering me about the hallway is the cramped access, that’s wasted living space.
The door at the kitchen is just to have a short way to the utility room/pantry. The “main way” goes past the stairs to the living room.
Having the shoes in the carport is currently no problem at all, and if we continued renting we wouldn’t change that for the next 20 years either. We don’t have snow or dirt at the moment, because the carport shall, as mentioned initially, be more or less enclosed and therefore dry (like now too). The front side is completely closed and the property is fully fenced, so at most animals can find their way there.


Of course we want to avoid that. If you place the entrance facing south, you could connect the utility room directly to the kitchen and avoid the long hallway. But then you’d have to come up with something great for the covering to the carport, that is still missing. I’m open to ideas here.



It’s supposed to be 2-3 in the end.
The room Child 1 actually serves only as a reserve in case there really are three children (we plan for 2-3). I am for it, my wife is not. We’ll see.

TVs in children’s rooms are actually a no-go for me. And a double bed for a child wouldn’t occur to me, max 1.40 m, but that is actually more of a luxury problem due to double mattress price. My childhood room was sometimes 9 m² with a normal 90 cm bed and I didn’t miss anything. As a woman, you’d probably need a bit more for the wardrobe, presumably given here.
I’m also not in favor of showering the kids with all sorts of luxury and pastimes.


Our bed is 2.10 m long, and we currently have a passage width of 70 cm. The 6 cm less won’t kill us. We don’t want a big bedroom, on the contrary. We only sleep there, it should be as small and dark as possible so that you can sleep in peace and air it quickly. I find this modern style of “as big and as bright as possible” nonsensical.
And with a small bedroom, the mirrored wardrobe is also closer to the bed.


We can’t and don’t want to invest much more money. Maybe max 10 x 11 m. But even then you don’t gain much.




That’s a good argument. But I don’t know how to solve that.

We want a home because we want to be for ourselves. A typical new residential area with 300 m² “space” for everyone was out of the question for us. I don’t want to stir my neighbor’s coffee cup on the terrace, and I also don’t want to have to whisper in the garden. We also want to sunbathe in peace without voyeurs. Privacy is a huge plus for us.
Otherwise, I could stay in an apartment and wouldn’t have to build a house. My home is my castle, and it has moats with sharp sticks around it.

On the plot, there are also many tall trees on the west side, and the house to the south is a large old building with two tall floors and apartments inside, the upper windows at an estimated 6 m height. There’s not much you can do with bushes and pergolas there. The carport or wooden garage is to be about 3 m high and the terrace roofing is planned as not transparent but at least milky.

The building window for the house is unfortunately quite tight:





The carport is actually our space saver. We currently also have such a huge, half-enclosed one and actually wouldn’t want to miss it at all because it’s simply great.
50 m² with 3 m height are approved in Saxony without a permit, the transition and the extension on the left are to be considered separately and not affixed in one monolithic block.

Maybe we could do without the guest room and instead enlarge the utility room + living room. I have to think about that.
 

Changeling

2017-08-21 10:13:49
  • #5
Oh, one more thing about moving the carport to the east side: then the terrace would be closer to the trees and the street. Unless you make the double carport one behind the other. But we currently have it like that, and it’s very annoying because we constantly have to swap the cars. In both cases, however, the terrace would be completely visible from the apartments to the south :-/

The only advantage would be a much less cramped version of the ground floor layout. Of course, that’s also worth a lot. But I don’t really want to be sitting there on display...
 

Curly

2017-08-21 10:14:24
  • #6
But you also can't compare a new building with an old farmhouse. Just take a look at large living rooms in a show home exhibition and measure the ceiling height; I find 2.40m far too low. I would try to plan the orientation on the plot differently; this way your living room and kitchen are completely dark, the sun never reaches them, especially not in winter. Can't you plan the garage or carport on the eastern side?

Best regards
Sabine
 

Similar topics
17.12.2013Floor plan single-family house with double garage and terrace19
06.05.2015Living/Dining/Kitchen: How do you live or how will you live?52
26.02.2015Living room floor plan ideas?39
08.01.2018Stairs in the hallway, the floor plan is actually already done :o(20
21.04.2015Is a floor plan with a garage feasible on the property?29
27.08.20152 full floors, passage to garage, utility room under stairs25
12.07.2016House construction on narrow land? 3-family house already exists56
13.10.2016Extra bathroom from the bedroom or storage room after all?29
29.07.2017Single-family house - city villa: Living room L or I shape?25
09.02.2018Floor plan for a 150 sqm single-family house with a living room facing north21
11.12.2017Floor plan design for narrow lot16
02.07.2018Stairs in the living room as a hype - Pros & Cons?26
31.12.2018Bedroom idea - bed / wardrobe arrangement32
26.04.2019Is the floor plan for the living room and hallway too narrow?21
28.07.2020Single-family house 160m2 with basement, 500m2 plot108
18.08.2020Floor plan of a single-family house without basement/bedroom and bathroom on the ground floor27
14.02.2021Optimization of 150m² single-family house @ 470m² & 19m narrow plot20
04.06.2021Floor plan 170m2 - Laundry room too small? Suggestions for improvement?42
27.06.2022North-West Facing Plot - Tips24
17.07.2024Floor plan design of a 100 m² bungalow with expansion reserve33

Oben