It just doesn’t really feel right...
The open space is purely square with artificial narrow spots, resulting in the kitchen taking up nearly 40% of the area due to the necessary distances between the cabinets, blocks, windows, and doors. On the remaining area, there is a tough Tetris-like battle for a dining table that works exactly but leaves no room to stretch out with the family and sit more people, and a corner couch that is positioned around a wart-like fireplace and a gigantic TV for an appropriate experience due to the >5m seating distance. The fireplace is, of course, far away from the line of sight from the couch where the family gathers in winter to watch a movie. Unfortunately, the entrance door is disproportionately small and also in the pathway of the kitchen block. If it opens to the other side, it won’t obstruct in the open position.
The statement staircase (which I basically like) becomes a dark ascent due to its central positioning in the house, unless massively brightened by roof windows or something similar, which, however, in summer would lead to corresponding heat or necessary darkening (again no light) as well as massive costs due to the respective size in the hallway. Unfortunately, no upper floor is attached here, as an installed window at the bottom of the plan might also be positively evaluated.
Research what glass surface remains at the entrance with the window width you drew in, it should be around 3 times about a hand’s width of glass each that you have drawn. There is also space under the stairs, should that be used?
The utility room is large, as far as it’s on the base slab, which I think is good, and the non-square room also creates wall space, but why a second door about 2m next to the entrance? Are you sure you need so much space and that the appliances can’t be distributed more usefully according to application?
The parents’ area is the next topic. The bed fits exactly into the room, which is smaller than the bathroom, but the dressing room is one and a half times bigger, yet illuminated only by the hand-width window already described. That will be as dark as a cave. Additionally, one wardrobe (does the door even open?) opens in front of the window, so only artificial light is left. The "catwalk" between the vertically drawn wardrobes in the plan is estimated at 2.5m, which is also too short to receive the lady of the house in the evening in a glamorous and seductive manner, but at the same time wide enough for another bag of chocolate candies to lie next to the bed. Compared to the used space, you have created little closet meters and these are distributed unfavorably.
All in all, the proportions (whether within or cross-room) in your design just don’t work for me, your ground floor provides over 40% of the space for utility areas (utility room, hallway, staircase, dressing room) (60 to 75 sqm remaining). Space for storage, staircase to get to the next floor, etc. is needed, but the question is whether it forms a flowing transition to the living area and is accordingly integrated and upgraded or merely present because necessary. It feels to me in the two upper designs that it rather bears the quality of necessity than staging. Best example staircase: basically upgraded by the landing but degraded to a means to an end due to the dark and hidden position in the center of the house outside the sight lines.
If you attach the upper floor or your ideas, it will probably be easier to continue working here. In addition, there would be some fundamental approaches that could make building simpler, such as optimized routing like short (water) pipes, walls stacked on top of each other for easier statics, etc., orientation on the plot, driveways could also be interesting, after all, you are building over quite a bit of area with your design.
The exaggeration at one or another point is meant just for entertainment ;)